stars hu .50/1 is it beatable with the rake? LIMCASH

[demon102]

wondering if anyone thinks its beatable with the rake capped at .50

[nomadtla]

over 16K hands I am beating it for 2.12 BB/100. So yeah I think it beatable or I've run really hot for the past 2 years.

[OziBattler]

limit or NL? do they even have LIMIT HEADS UP tables at stars?

[Gib]

[ QUOTE ]
limit or NL? do they even have LIMIT HEADS UP tables at stars?

[/ QUOTE ]
yup, they do now [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[Brain]

[ QUOTE ]
limit or NL? do they even have LIMIT HEADS UP tables at stars?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yep, they're at the very bottom of the lobby list, regardless of stakes.

[Buzz-cp]

[ QUOTE ]
over 16K hands I am beating it for 2.12 BB/100. So yeah I think itbeatable or I've run really hot for the past 2 years.

[/ QUOTE ]

heads-up?

This thread should probably be moved to the HU forum or maybe SSSH, cuz I really dunno. [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]

[MrWookie]

[ QUOTE ]
Heads-Up: rake will be collected on "1-on-1" tables at a rate of $0.05 rake per $1.00 in the pot, up to a maximum of $0.50 rake per hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmmm. Let's say 70% of hands hit the flop, and an average pot size of 4 BB. That's 0.20 lost every hand that's raked, or an average of $0.14/hand. That works out to be a whopping 14 BB/100 in rake. I'm going to put my vote in the "no" column.

[brandysbich]

If we talking limit then hell no, if nl then hell yes

[demon102]

I put this in microlimit furom and it got moved here

[Leader]

I would also say no