#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ziigmund
I know that Ziigmund is Ilari Sahamies. I know he can win a lot or lose a lot in any given session. My questions are:
1.Is his ultra-aggressive style even close to being sound/correct, even given that he's playing short-handed so much? 2.Is there another prominent PLO player who plays so aggressively, or is Ziigmund the Aggro King? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ziigmund
Seems to be the fitting thread:
Is this a sound preflop call with 669T? Maybe it's just me but that wouldnt be a play that looks solid to me (but I just recently started playing Omaha). http://www.pokerhand.org/?1338204 http://twodimes.net/h/?z=2931940 pokenum -mc 500000 -o 9d 6d 6h ts - as qs ac 3d Omaha Hi: 500000 sampled boards cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV Ts 9d 6d 6h 188392 37.68 311608 62.32 0 0.00 0.377 As Qs Ac 3d 311608 62.32 188392 37.68 0 0.00 0.623 Does he have enough equity to call preflop considering he isnt deep? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ziigmund
679T would be much better than 669T. Really is awful to take smaller pocket pairs against bigger ones.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ziigmund
I wonder what Brandon Adams folded after threebetting preflop there. KKxx maybe?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ziigmund
probably a marginal gambling call here
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ziigmund
If it was KK there was definitely an ace attached, he saw himself as drawing thin which is why the fold came.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ziigmund
If your Brandon Adams are you calling off the rest of your chips with which of these hands:
A) KKJ9ss D) 101099ss G) AKKJds B) 10976ss E) QJ98ds H) 4567 unsuited C) 7766ds F) 3456ds |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ziigmund
I'm calling off with any 4 random cards that don't have an ace in. Pairs I would throw.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ziigmund
I can't imagine what Brandon Adams 3-bets more than 1/4 of his stack with and then folds to a 4-bet. What's the point of even making that raise is you're not looking to get your stack in?
I guess it has to be AKK. He must have been looking to get in on any flop, but then when he got reraised, he decided he was against AA absolutely 100% of the time and folded. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ziigmund
[ QUOTE ]
I guess it has to be AKK. [/ QUOTE ] Agree. But with an absolute pants 4th card as well, and no flush draw. AKK7 unsuited or something. |
|
|