Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-03-2007, 11:26 AM
Bill Haywood Bill Haywood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 746
Default Controlled implosion of Minnesota bridge

One argument of 911 conspiracy theorists is that on the way down, the towers made way too much dust, so the clouds must have been created by explosives.

Looks like the black helicopters were in the Minneapple this week. Army corp of Enginners camera they forgot to disable.

And what's with the woman walking back and forth in front of the camera? That looks suspicious, but I can't figure out why. Anyone?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-03-2007, 11:42 AM
adios adios is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,132
Default Re: Controlled implosion of Minnesota bridge

[ QUOTE ]
One argument of 911 conspiracy theorists is that on the way down, the towers made way too much dust, so the clouds must have been created by explosives.

Looks like the black helicopters were in the Minneapple this week. Army corp of Enginners camera they forgot to disable.

And what's with the woman walking back and forth in front of the camera? That looks suspicious, but I can't figure out why. Anyone?

[/ QUOTE ]

Thank you I just won a bet!!!!! I bet a friend that someone would be bringing this up on this forum within a week of the bridge collapse. This stuff is so predictable.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-03-2007, 12:00 PM
Bobbo539 Bobbo539 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 139
Default Re: Controlled implosion of Minnesota bridge

I think there are an unlimited number of circumstances that could be construed to imply a government conspiracy, and in any major event, people who look hard enough will find a few of them.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-03-2007, 12:11 PM
DVaut1 DVaut1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 4,751
Default Re: Controlled implosion of Minnesota bridge

[ QUOTE ]
And what's with the woman walking back and forth in front of the camera? That looks suspicious, but I can't figure out why. Anyone?

[/ QUOTE ]

Looks suspiciously like a Bilderberg operative. Obvious Trialateral Commission planned detonation. Let's meet in a compound in the Idaho wilderness to discuss.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-03-2007, 02:02 PM
Rick Nebiolo Rick Nebiolo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,634
Default Re: Controlled implosion of Minnesota bridge

[ QUOTE ]
Thank you I just won a bet!!!!! I bet a friend that someone would be bringing this up on this forum within a week of the bridge collapse. This stuff is so predictable.

[/ QUOTE ]

I hope it was for about a dollar because otherwise you were taking advantage of a sure thing.

~ Rick
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-03-2007, 02:08 PM
MrMon MrMon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Fighting Mediocrity Everywhere
Posts: 3,334
Default Re: Controlled implosion of Minnesota bridge

My thought too. I actually though we'd see this by yesterday.

Yes it was a sure thing, which is why the bet should have been over/under in terms of hours.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-03-2007, 02:13 PM
Dan. Dan. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The European Phenom
Posts: 3,836
Default Re: Controlled implosion of Minnesota bridge

[ QUOTE ]
Thank you I just won a bet!!!!! I bet a friend that someone would be bringing this up on this forum within a week of the bridge collapse. This stuff is so predictable.

[/ QUOTE ]

There are 2 things I question about this post: 1) Someone actually took the other side of the bet????? Have they never even clicked on Politics? 2) You discuss 2p2 with people outside of 2p2?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-04-2007, 10:39 AM
Kaj Kaj is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bet-the-pot
Posts: 1,812
Default Re: Controlled implosion of Minnesota bridge

[ QUOTE ]
I think there are an unlimited number of circumstances that could be construed to imply a government conspiracy, and in any major event, people who look hard enough will find a few of them.

[/ QUOTE ]

That sounds like just the thing a govt-placed 2+2 plant would say.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-06-2007, 07:54 AM
The Truth The Truth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Word?
Posts: 3,361
Default Re: Controlled implosion of Minnesota bridge

[ QUOTE ]
One argument of 911 conspiracy theorists is that on the way down, the towers made way too much dust, so the clouds must have been created by explosives.

Looks like the black helicopters were in the Minneapple this week. Army corp of Enginners camera they forgot to disable.

And what's with the woman walking back and forth in front of the camera? That looks suspicious, but I can't figure out why. Anyone?

[/ QUOTE ]

no body has given us an adequate sequential explaination for the collapse.

They just say rumbling (kasplosions) and then "global collapse" wtf! rigged.


Not only that, but they had been preparing for a disaster 2 days BEFORE the collapse...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-06-2007, 10:11 AM
elwoodblues elwoodblues is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweet Home, Chicago
Posts: 4,485
Default Re: Controlled implosion of Minnesota bridge

[ QUOTE ]
Not only that, but they had been preparing for a disaster 2 days BEFORE the collapse...

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh my...this is damning evidence. Now, if you could just show me some numbers about all the times they have prepared in some way for a disaster and nothing happened.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.