#1
|
|||
|
|||
Blind defense vs TAG steal
Villain is 29/21/2 ATS:40
How thin do you go with aces here? Every ace? I rly need to review blind defense ranges Absolute Poker Limit Holdem Ring game Limit: $5/$10 6 players Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is BB with A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 3 folds, <font color="#cc0000">BTN raises,</font> SB folds, Hero calls. Flop: 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (4.6SB, 2 players) Hero checks, <font color="#cc0000">BTN bets</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises</font>, BTN calls. Turn: Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (4.3BB, 2 players) <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets</font>, BTN calls. River: 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (6.3BB, 2 players) Hero checks, |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind defense vs TAG steal
I defend with any A here. I made a post about this spot about a week ago or so, and the consenus was to just c/f these flops.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind defense vs TAG steal
[ QUOTE ]
I defend with any A here. I made a post about this spot about a week ago or so, and the consenus was to just c/f these flops. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, I like where your head is, but this flop hits his range so hard with pairs or draws that your FE is miniscule. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind defense vs TAG steal
By defend ?she? means call and eval the flop.
[ QUOTE ] the consenus was to just c/f these flops. [/ QUOTE ] A high blind defense |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind defense vs TAG steal
[ QUOTE ]
By defend ?she? means call and eval the flop. [ QUOTE ] the consenus was to just c/f these flops. [/ QUOTE ] A high blind defense [/ QUOTE ] yea I meant at least call an A. I tend to 3 bet A7s+ A8o+ though. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind defense vs TAG steal
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] By defend ?she? means call and eval the flop. [ QUOTE ] the consenus was to just c/f these flops. [/ QUOTE ] A high blind defense [/ QUOTE ] yea I meant at least call an A. I tend to 3 bet A7s+ A8o+ though. [/ QUOTE ] I think it's spewy to go that low. You get less value from worse hands that miss and you getting RIOed to death. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind defense vs TAG steal
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] By defend ?she? means call and eval the flop. [ QUOTE ] the consenus was to just c/f these flops. [/ QUOTE ] A high blind defense [/ QUOTE ] yea I meant at least call an A. I tend to 3 bet A7s+ A8o+ though. [/ QUOTE ] I think it's spewy to go that low. You get less value from worse hands that miss and you getting RIOed to death. [/ QUOTE ] MHSH disagrees |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind defense vs TAG steal
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] By defend ?she? means call and eval the flop. [ QUOTE ] the consenus was to just c/f these flops. [/ QUOTE ] A high blind defense [/ QUOTE ] yea I meant at least call an A. I tend to 3 bet A7s+ A8o+ though. [/ QUOTE ] I think it's spewy to go that low. You get less value from worse hands that miss and you getting RIOed to death. [/ QUOTE ] MHSH disagrees [/ QUOTE ] To be clear, against a button steal, I usually defend down to A2o - my spewish comment was directed towards 3-betting a7s or such from the BB. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind defense vs TAG steal
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] By defend ?she? means call and eval the flop. [ QUOTE ] the consenus was to just c/f these flops. [/ QUOTE ] A high blind defense [/ QUOTE ] yea I meant at least call an A. I tend to 3 bet A7s+ A8o+ though. [/ QUOTE ] I think it's spewy to go that low. You get less value from worse hands that miss and you getting RIOed to death. [/ QUOTE ] MHSH disagrees [/ QUOTE ] To be clear, against a button steal, I usually defend down to A2o - my spewish comment was directed towards 3-betting a7s or such from the BB. [/ QUOTE ] Out of curiosity, how low would you go? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind defense vs TAG steal
TBH, HU vs. a button stealer, I very rarely 3-bet with Ax - more likely something in the AT-AQ range. AK vs. someone who is both overaggro and will call down with AQ UI.
I'm much more likely to 3-bet with something that has less intrinsic showdown value, such as KQ or QJs or 66. |
|
|