#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL25: QQ overpair c/r on a multiway pot
Full Tilt Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game Blinds: $0.10/$0.25 9 players Converter Stack sizes: UTG: $3.45 UTG+1: $6.40 MP1: $36.15 MP2: $18.70 Hero: $25 CO: $17.55 Button: $28.35 SB: $20.85 BB: $34.65 Pre-flop: (9 players) Hero is MP3 with Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 4 folds, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $1</font>, CO calls $1 <font color="aaaaaa">(pot was $1.35)</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Button raises to $1.75</font>, 2 folds, Hero calls $0.75 <font color="aaaaaa">(pot was $4.1)</font>, CO calls $0.75 <font color="aaaaaa">(pot was $4.85)</font>. Flop: 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($5.6, 3 players) Hero checks, <font color="#cc0000">CO bets $5.6</font>, Button calls $5.6 <font color="aaaaaa">(pot was $11.2)</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises all-in $23.25</font> Button is 22/5/2.5 No reads or stats on CO. I think this can be profitable at NL25 because villains will not fold overpairs like TT-JJ. But at small stakes must be better do this with a draw. Although, I don't think there is other way to play this hand. C/f and c/c looks too weak. Any advice? Thanks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25: QQ overpair c/r on a multiway pot
You could have reraised preflop over the min-raise from LP. Make it $4 and consider folding to the preflop push from a 2% PFR'er who just min-reraised you. On the flop, if called, bet out and make a judgement call if villain doesn't just fold on this low flop.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25: QQ overpair c/r on a multiway pot
I think it looks fine here.
I agree, not many other wasy to play it here. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25: QQ overpair c/r on a multiway pot
What's button's 3-bet range? If he is tight and reraises preflop with KK+, AK, then your push allows him to fold his AK for $5 and stack you with KK+. Even if CO doesn't have a big hand and folds to your push i don't think you're ahead often enough.
|
|
|