Legit question. Can "they" ever stop WU or MG deposits?

Broke Rounder · #1 07-23-2007, 01:42 PM

How can they stop these methods of deposits? Mods feel free to delete if this post is innopropiate due to the current nature of US deposits/withdrawals.

EvanW76 · #2 07-23-2007, 02:21 PM

I don't think there are any ways to bring to a total stop, but there are many ways to keep the number of transfers to a minimum. Some of these possibilities include more thorough verification/documentation for overseas transfers, monitoring/blocking the names listed by gambling sites to be used for transfers, and WU/MG policy changed to alter how funds can be picked up.

I don't see it ever happening, but I suppose it's possible.

EW76

CountingMyOuts · #3 07-23-2007, 03:39 PM

If "they" can stop Neteller, "they" can stop WU or MG.

sup_bro · #4 07-23-2007, 03:50 PM

i really dont see a way...random numbers sent to some remote place...just like cashier cheques cant be blocked i think MG is safe to assume it really cant be blocked....i really dont know enough about WU to comment...

CountingMyOuts · #5 07-23-2007, 04:08 PM

All "they" would need to do is arrest the CEO of WU or MG, a la Neteller.

sup_bro · #6 07-23-2007, 04:21 PM

[ QUOTE ]
All "they" would need to do is arrest the CEO of WU or MG, a la Neteller.

[/ QUOTE ]

not quite NETELLER knowingly transferred money onto gambling sites while WU or MG is not KNOWINGLY doing it...they are sending they money offshore thousands of times a day and mostly for "legitimate" purposes....kind of like trying to block paper cheques, it is impossible to do since there are so many transactions 95% of which are legit.....NETELLER's business for 95% of it was for gaming purposes.....

CountingMyOuts · #7 07-23-2007, 04:43 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
All "they" would need to do is arrest the CEO of WU or MG, a la Neteller.

[/ QUOTE ]

not quite NETELLER knowingly transferred money onto gambling sites while WU or MG is not KNOWINGLY doing it...they are sending they money offshore thousands of times a day and mostly for "legitimate" purposes....kind of like trying to block paper cheques, it is impossible to do since there are so many transactions 95% of which are legit.....NETELLER's business for 95% of it was for gaming purposes.....

[/ QUOTE ]

Fair enough, you are right. We will always have WU/MG as a deposit method and there is no way that WU/MG can be stopped.

cardman · #8 07-23-2007, 04:52 PM

[ QUOTE ]
How can they stop these methods of deposits? Mods feel free to delete if this post is innopropiate due to the current nature of US deposits/withdrawals.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ask Bodog. Might not be stopped but difficult to maintain it seems.

cardman · #9 07-23-2007, 04:54 PM

[ QUOTE ]

Fair enough, you are right. We will always have WU/MG as a deposit method and there is no way that WU/MG can be stopped.

[/ QUOTE ]

On rare occasions, WU does blacklist customers. Don't know what causes it though.

Pokeraddict · #10 07-23-2007, 05:38 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How can they stop these methods of deposits? Mods feel free to delete if this post is innopropiate due to the current nature of US deposits/withdrawals.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ask Bodog. Might not be stopped but difficult to maintain it seems.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm sure this had to do with the large volume. Although MG/WU say "Do not use this for gambling purposes" it can only be to cover their ass. I can imagine a good chunk of their business is for under the table purposes.