#1
|
|||
|
|||
100 NL, I am unbluffable.
Villain here is a loose donk. A few hands earlier he called a raise OOP with A2 offsuit, and lost a medium-sized pot when an ace flopped (I had AK).
Poker Stars - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.50/$1 Blinds - 9 Players - (LegoPoker HH Converter) SB: $90.25 Hero (BB): $124.90 UTG: $96.50 UTG+1: $169.80 MP1: $106.40 MP2: $78.50 MP3: $106.30 CO: $48.45 BTN: $47.95 Preflop: Hero is dealt 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (9 Players) 5 folds, CO calls $1.00, 2 folds, Hero checks Flop: ($2.50) 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">Hero bets $2.00</font>, CO calls $2.00 Turn: ($6.50) Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">Hero bets $4.50</font>, CO calls $4.50 River: ($15.50) T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players) Hero checks, <font color="red">CO bets all-in for $40.95</font>, LOL call this? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 NL, I am unbluffable.
I'm interested in why you checked the river....results aside. And yes, I call. I'm guessing you don't have many hands or you would have stats. Without any reads tho and having seen him calling large bets with tpnk, I just bet about $12 on the river.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 NL, I am unbluffable.
His stats are 63/0 over 19 hands fwiw. I just think providing an actual hand example is more useful than raw numbers over a tiny sample.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 NL, I am unbluffable.
Nope, can't make that call. We're not good here enough to make this a good percentage play.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 NL, I am unbluffable.
[ QUOTE ]
Nope, can't make that call. We're not good here enough to make this a good percentage play. [/ QUOTE ] I will stack off against a player like this all night with any 2 pair on most any board. You can just figure 50% bluff trash with them and go from there. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 NL, I am unbluffable.
id call, its close but call
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 NL, I am unbluffable.
Yeah, the more I think about this, the more I think a bet is the way to go. I think you miss way to much value against someone who's likely to call with a Jack and so forth who will just check behind. Now, this comes from my experience playing these types in limit. I don't have enough experience in NL to make this call for sure, but it makes the most sense to me here.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 NL, I am unbluffable.
His range is huge and you are ahead of most of it ... call, and if he wins then reload and get it back from him another hand ...
63/0 ffs |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 NL, I am unbluffable.
If your read said aggrodonk, something like "bets when checked to", i'd call. But these 63/0 types usually don't do this, they love to play any draw to the river, then open-shove when it hits. Villain is unlikely but not impossible to have limped AK, 98 is in his range, as are a lot of hands that give him better two pair, or even a set. So i'd fold here.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 NL, I am unbluffable.
I think it's a fold becaus
1. villian is 63/0, which = passive donkey, not aggro donkey. 2. therefore would be less likely to bluff river like this. |
|
|