#1
|
|||
|
|||
Sit e go itm finish distribution
Whats the standard itm finish distribution for good players?
33% each for 1st, 2nd and 3rd? Or good players usually have more firsts? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sit e go itm finish distribution
last time I looked I had slightly more first than seconds and slightly more seconds than 3rds.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sit e go itm finish distribution
I ask because i usually had more firsts, but actually i am at
35%, 34%, 30% for 1st, 2nd and 3rd. (Small sample size yet- only 650 sits). |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sit e go itm finish distribution
I think something like 38 29 33 is a good one. Guess the great ones can get less than 33 % thirds, but not sure if they make firsts or seconds from them.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sit e go itm finish distribution
More firsts and 3rds than seconds. I think at the top levels, you'll probably have more 3rds than 1sts, as making it into the money often *but not always* is the best way to gain equity.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sit e go itm finish distribution
For some reason my distribution peaks with seconds. I think it might be due to running bad heads up so far cos i'm playing ok heads. Maybe also being too conservative on the bubble and 3 handed. Anyone else have this problem?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sit e go itm finish distribution
Peaking 2nd is the worst possible scenario, as you would make far more $$$ splitting those 2nds to 1sts and 3rds. Actually, peaking 4th would be worst, but you get what I'm trying to say.. DUCY?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sit e go itm finish distribution
I think you'll need a pretty big sample from a good player to get an answear thats even close to accurate. During my last 50 STTs I havent finished 3rd a single time. I have a feeling the good players have about equal first and third place finishes, and then a little lower in 2nd, I have too, but I have only logged about 400 SnGs.
|
|
|