|
|
#1
07-16-2007, 04:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Positive ROI playing 26 tables at a time
|
|
#2
07-16-2007, 04:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Positive ROI playing 26 tables at a time
yes this is done all the time, ive done it, i gotta take a break after a hour or so lol
|
|
#4
07-16-2007, 04:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Positive ROI playing 26 tables at a time
[ QUOTE ]
I'm pretty sure he didn't have a + ROI, and especially not when doing that. Ryan [/ QUOTE ] He was always on that many tables and his sharkscope graph has been posted many times. He was winning. |
|
#6
07-16-2007, 05:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Positive ROI playing 26 tables at a time
[ QUOTE ]
I'm pretty sure he didn't have a + ROI, and especially not when doing that. Ryan [/ QUOTE ] He didn't turn into a losing SNG player until he moved way up and cut down on tables. |
|
#7
07-16-2007, 06:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Positive ROI playing 26 tables at a time
wow yeah that was awesome watching him bash fold a million times.
|
|
#8
07-16-2007, 08:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Positive ROI playing 26 tables at a time
boku 25-tables the 60's like every friggin day. nothing great, but he has a postive roi, and probably makes $35/hour in fpp's.
the funny thing about boku is that i dont ever remember him siitting out, using the time bank, or even playing slow.... |
|
#9
07-16-2007, 10:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Positive ROI playing 26 tables at a time
Anyone have thoughts on multi-screen vs single-screen ?
Example: 4 screens of 4 each non-overlapping vs 1 screen of 16 popping up ? Personally, I think 1 screen is easier. |
|
#10
07-16-2007, 10:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Positive ROI playing 26 tables at a time
**From a post replying to SpaceGravy's brag on 35-tabling**
Last Feburary I was 38-tabling the 16s for 2 weeks straight, profitably. You really can't be serious when you know I was the first one to do this. Although i'm done with the mega multi-tabling, I still like to remain assured that I was the only one to do it profitably for as long as I did. Until you put in three months of playing at least 27 or more at once, then you are not correct in saying you are the first and only one who can do it. Aside from my argument, how is the variance treating you? I had some pretty sick downswings that lasted even weeks long. My advice is that you only do this for a mere entertainment's sake, because the volatility of the buyins you can win/drop can severely affect your temperment (which we all know controls our tilt). Good luck! Oh and one more thing, the most I have had going on at once is 43 tables. Now, you may be able to surpass that but why even bother? I believe it is just egotistical past 38 since I know I would not be profitable past 38 at once. If I really wanted to just for ego's sake, then I would have had over 50 at once last winter. RaiNKhAN |
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
