which is easier, full tilt or pstars?

[nudemolerat]

[BALLSDEEEP]

just get a pattern mapper for both?

[nudemolerat]

pattern mapper?

[RikaKazak]

[ QUOTE ]
pattern mapper?

[/ QUOTE ]

ZOMG you don't have a pattern mapper?

[ILuvRiver]

Define easier.

Easier to play on (which has best software)

or

Easier to win on (Fishiest!)

[ment52]

[ QUOTE ]
Define easier.

Easier to play on (which has best software)

or

Easier to win on (Fishiest!)

[/ QUOTE ]
Please read the headline of the poll again and be quiet.

[Clever Nickname]

At the 200NL level I've found Full Tilt to be way, way, way fishier than stars.

[mattw]

[ QUOTE ]
pattern mapper?

[/ QUOTE ]

pattern mapper: noun. a means for those who believe that sites are rigged which can beat the riggness(is that a word?) by knowing which cards will fall. it is often used in conjuction by wearing a tin foil hat to further disrupt the sites cheating. be sure the shiny side is out.

pattern mapper and tin foil hats are long time jokes here at the zoo(internet gambling forum.)

in all seriousness, its often difficult to get reasonable answers or info. too many smart asses who think they are funny.

i cant answer your poll/question directly as i dont play FT. too many issues still unresolved. because PS has so many more players, i think PS has more fish. a better question would be what is the shark to fish ratio.

welcome to the forums.

edit: spelling and clarity.

[DMoogle]

[ QUOTE ]
At the 200NL level I've found Full Tilt to be way, way, way fishier than stars.

[/ QUOTE ]
Maybe it's sample size? I've found them to be almost equal, but Stars a little fishier.

[ILuvRiver]

my bad, sorry <slaps himself with a fish>