Pstars or Full Tilt Sng's??

[Evolve]

I have an account with both but i haven't depostied anything on full tilt yet. Are the sng's on full tilt easier than on pstars?

I mainly play the 6.50's on pstars.

[CheeseMoney]

IBL.

[Stake Monster]

similar difficulty, but different blind/payout structures.

[jesse8888]

To my knowledge the payout structure is the same....

The Levels on FullTilt are only 3 minutes long, but the jump from level to level is smaller. Also, fulltilt has no Antes (at least I haven't seen them). I find it's harder to calculate my M on fulltilt cause the blinds will be something stupid like 120/240, where as on stars the worst it ever is is 75/150.

At the 6.50 level if you can beat one you can beat the other. Fulltilt has a better initial bonus, I think, so if you have no other criteria, do full tilt.

[alex-star]

don't forget that you get rakeback on FTP.

[DeuceSeven]

When I played 5.50s UB, Stars, and FTP were all roughly the same.

[lacky]

[ QUOTE ]
don't forget that you get rakeback on FTP.

[/ QUOTE ]

once you hit supernova the rakeback is similer or better at stars. The software is better at stars. I've played about 200 $60's at each site with similer results. toss up probably.

[StregaChess]

I think the main advantage is on FT you can create silly icons so you can dress like a woman.

[Jbrochu]

wAHTS About Bodog or maybe even UB...? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[alex-star]

I'd argue that FTP software is actually better. For one thing, on FTP you do not spend 200000000000000000 minutes waiting for the cards to be dealt out when you're all in. Also FT seems to be actively developing their software unlike PStars. The only huge downside of FTP right now is a lack of ability to import tournee summaries. I had to write a log parser to actually get this into Poker Tracker.