Poker Tracker vs Poker Office

derek luv · #1 06-17-2007, 02:26 PM

I see most people on 2+2 using PokerTracker and I just recently tried out PokerOffice and I liked it a LOT better. Seemed to be more usable and didn't have such a steep learning curve. The overlay seemed just as nice (if not nicer) than Poker Ace Hud. So what are the major differences between PokerTracker and PokerOffice and what makes most people use the former?

CudjoeBill · #2 06-17-2007, 08:21 PM

Search is your friend. There are many, many threads regarding this subject.

The Bandit Fish · #3 06-18-2007, 09:57 AM

The DB and filtering functions of PT are much better than PO, but the overlay and live tracker on PO is much more more useful than pahud or any of the things I've tried with PT.
You just have to decide what is more important to you.

tomtemor · #4 06-18-2007, 11:24 AM

You can't go wrong (oh well...) if you try them both.

The Bandit Fish · #5 06-19-2007, 05:52 PM

[ QUOTE ]
You can't go wrong (oh well...) if you try them both.

[/ QUOTE ]

I personally use them both. PO is more useful while playing and PT is more useful otherwise. In the rand scheme of things neither is that expensive (although I did get PO before it was $80/year). Both can be invaluable tools.