|
View Poll Results: limit: 300 BB, NL: | |||
5 | 3 | 9.38% | |
10 | 10 | 31.25% | |
15 | 13 | 40.63% | |
20 | 3 | 9.38% | |
25 | 3 | 9.38% | |
Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
TAG vs LAG
Lots of people recommend a ABC TAG style of game, but increasingly people are talking about playing LAG as being better. A big reason for this is probably card runners videos that often show LAG play.
So what play do you guys use? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TAG vs LAG
I try to play my opponents.
Kinda TAG readless. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TAG vs LAG
i have semi laggy numbers (29/23/3) but i advocate switching gears and tightening up when neccessary.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TAG vs LAG
Ideally your style will be seamless, because your style should adapt to the table that you are playing at. That being said, at the lower limits NL25 and below, a straightforward style is generally the one that will make you the most consistent variance free money.
If you are a good hand reader, and can play well post-flop however, LAG will always get you the higher winrate. Fact is, most people don't play well postflop, and don't now how to play against people who will play ATCs. Therefore it is generally better to play a basic TAG game at the low limits. But for an idea of how well a LAG can do at these levels, read fimbulwinters post on NL25. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TAG vs LAG
Where's the "nit" option?
|
|
|