#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is 500 PTBB/100 sustainable?
Just started playing PLO under a new name at a new site
Brag: 499 PTBB/100 Beat: it's $25 PLO Variance: I might just be running good, hmmmm |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is 500 PTBB/100 sustainable?
are you [censored] serious?
[x] not even a sample |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is 500 PTBB/100 sustainable?
Well, it's over 167 hands, so probably.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is 500 PTBB/100 sustainable?
I was expecting something like 5 hands. 167 is a good number!!!
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is 500 PTBB/100 sustainable?
ummm, in PLO, 500 is def. not sustainable, especially when you only have 167 hands. Can you show some hands on how you got to +382 at 25PLO?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is 500 PTBB/100 sustainable?
lol @ skeptics. PLO$25? Sustainable.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is 500 PTBB/100 sustainable?
I think 500BB/100 is a little high. In the long run (>300 hands), you probably won't be able to sustain more then 300, maybe 325 if you're really good.
SpaceAce |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is 500 PTBB/100 sustainable?
I dunno if you guys have ever played PLO$25, but people there seriously don't always know what hands they have... I had a guy call down on a 4-spade board with the As only and then bitch that it was rigged because he lost. PLO50 isn't a whole lot harder.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is 500 PTBB/100 sustainable?
I didn't know PLO games were so soft...kind of makes me want to learn it, but then again unlimited hold them is the cadillac of poker.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is 500 PTBB/100 sustainable?
167 hands in 170 minutes, how slow were these games?
|
|
|