#1
|
|||
|
|||
$27 JJ vs reraise
POKERSTARS GAME #10305784769: TOURNAMENT #52219370, $25+$2 HOLD'EM NO LIMIT - LEVEL VII (100/200) - 2007/06/06 - 18:42:38 (ET)
Table '52219370 1' 9-max Seat #7 is the button Seat 1: PEINEGER (3715 in chips) Seat 3: levistep (1935 in chips) Seat 7: rrigod (2950 in chips) Seat 8: johngolf2000 (4900 in chips) PEINEGER: posts the ante 25 levistep: posts the ante 25 rrigod: posts the ante 25 johngolf2000: posts the ante 25 johngolf2000: posts small blind 100 PEINEGER: posts big blind 200 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to rrigod [Jh Js] levistep: folds rrigod: raises 400 to 600 johngolf2000: raises 4275 to 4875 and is all-in PEINEGER: folds rrigod:????????? Sorry to lazy(drunk) to convert. He is a good winning player based on sharkscope. Stats are 20/16 over 270 hands. Is this a snap call? I feel like JJ is ahead of his range because he made a similar move earlier. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $27 JJ vs reraise
if hes been active im calling. if youve been pushbotting sometimes id open shove this.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $27 JJ vs reraise
I would call. I wouldn't open shove however, even if you have been active.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $27 JJ vs reraise
There's a huge variety of reasons to call here. Even if the numbers say "fold," I'd call here. If he's a regular I call then I send him a PM and an Email saying "don't [censored] with me bitch." If he hits his 3 outer, fine. If he has AA, fine. It happens. But something tells me that against a regular "good" opponent this isn't close to a "bad" call, considering you're in not good shape if you fold. I especially like the line that goes "call, get shown 2 undercards, win, pee in opponent's mouth."
|
|
|