|
|
#1
06-05-2007, 11:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
anyone else "pay" more than they earned. (with sample size)
I have 5 databases and I was just looking at my lastest one and it shows three dollars more of rake than winnings over a small but, not too small sampling of 43k hands. 
|
|
#2
06-05-2007, 04:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
[ QUOTE ]
anyone else "pay" more than they earned. (with sample size) I have 5 databases and I was just looking at my lastest one and it shows three dollars more of rake than winnings over a small but, not too small sampling of 43k hands. [/ QUOTE ] Nope, I've never not won more than 2ptbb or so over any sample.
|
|
#4
06-05-2007, 04:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
This seems as good a time as any to ask, what does beating the rake mean?
Does beating the rake mean earning $200 after playing 1000 hands and paying $300 in rake, meaning you took $500 off the players? Or does beating the rake mean me earning $500 after playing 1000 hands and paying $300 in rake, meaning you took $800 off the players?
|
|
#5
06-05-2007, 04:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
Ignore my post like the poker community does Annie Duke and Howard Lederer.
|
|
#8
06-05-2007, 04:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
[ QUOTE ]
lol i thought having profits < rake paid was standard [/ QUOTE ] It is.
|
|
#10
06-05-2007, 05:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] anyone else "pay" more than they earned. (with sample size) I have 5 databases and I was just looking at my lastest one and it shows three dollars more of rake than winnings over a small but, not too small sampling of 43k hands. [/ QUOTE ] Nope, I've never not won more than 2ptbb or so over any sample. [/ QUOTE ] This is a lie. DUCY?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
