#1
|
|||
|
|||
Stars 5400 FPP Sat: Super-Awesome or Super-Awful
5 left, 4 pay $215T, BB forced all-in, I'm UTG with very short stack and trash (trying to encourage unmentionable collusion), big stacks not playing to end it for whatever reason, blah, blah, blah...
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t600 (5 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums) BB (t650) Hero (t830) MP (t4135) Button (t7230) SB (t2155) Preflop: Hero is UTG with 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. Hero calls t600, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, SB completes. Flop: (t1150) T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> SB checks, Hero checks. Turn: (t1150) 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">SB bets t600</font>, Hero calls t180 (All-In). River: (t1930) K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players, 1 all-in)</font> Final Pot: t1930 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars 5400 FPP Sat: Super-Awesome or Super-Awful
what happened to the BB? also you might as well wait for the BB and hope you have a better hand than 49
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars 5400 FPP Sat: Super-Awesome or Super-Awful
BB forced all-in by blinds, see post.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars 5400 FPP Sat: Super-Awesome or Super-Awful
BB was forced all in with ante. I don't think it makes a huge differnce either way, only because your hand is so sucky. If it were a little better I'd say hell yeah.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars 5400 FPP Sat: Super-Awesome or Super-Awful
I like it and would do the same. Is there a reason you only called instead of just shoving pf? I can't see any situation where you would fold after getting the 600 in.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars 5400 FPP Sat: Super-Awesome or Super-Awful
[ QUOTE ]
I like it and would do the same. Is there a reason you only called instead of just shoving pf? I can't see any situation where you would fold after getting the 600 in. [/ QUOTE ] To make sure that SB calls? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars 5400 FPP Sat: Super-Awesome or Super-Awful
Psychologically, I thought limping would encourage the big stacks to understand that they should limp along too. Given some previous hands, I was genuinely concerned that the BB would get a walk or one of the big stacks would shove and discourage any other play.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars 5400 FPP Sat: Super-Awesome or Super-Awful
[ QUOTE ]
I like it and would do the same. Is there a reason you only called instead of just shoving pf? I can't see any situation where you would fold after getting the 600 in. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] (trying to encourage unmentionable collusion) [/ QUOTE ] |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars 5400 FPP Sat: Super-Awesome or Super-Awful
Yeah I guess that makes sense, regardless you are all in with the shortstack so you might as well try whatever you can to make sure you get the additional caller.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars 5400 FPP Sat: Super-Awesome or Super-Awful
yea, i mean, if the SB folds this play is a disaster
|
|
|