Harrington's Ms and Qs

[DiCkO]

Does anyone pay attention to these? It seems all ICM calcs focus on BB/stack ratio rather than M.

M values as advocated in HoH seem to encourage loose pushes in ICM terms. Is this right or is it just that M is more for MTTs? I can't see any difference between a STT and FT of a MTT in terms of analysing usefulness of M.

Also, Q is virtually useless in STTs right?

[PattdownManiac]

Unread the HOH books!

[fsoyars]

[ QUOTE ]
I can't see any difference between a STT and FT of a MTT in terms of analysing usefulness of M.


[/ QUOTE ]

Applications of M in STTs differ from those in MTT FTs bc of the drastic differences in payout structures.

[lwrunner103]

O GOD!

[Sounded Simple]

[ QUOTE ]
Unread the HOH books!

[/ QUOTE ]

I found the HOH books helpful for MTT but some of his STT advice looks a little loose early.
Should I just disregard his STT advice?

[lwrunner103]

disregard the whole book IMO this forum>>>>HOH

[Sounded Simple]

Even the MTT stuff??!!

[NU Star]

[ QUOTE ]
Even the MTT stuff??!!

[/ QUOTE ]

No, there's some useful stuff, especially starting out, but there is definitely some room for polishing and you shouldn't take it as gospel.