#1
|
|||
|
|||
50NL: Really bad spot with deeeep stacks versus nitty
Villian is 18/15/5 over 350 hands. I've been 3betting him light some, I think he's noticed and he's starting to call slightly more. hand history didn't record so this is from memory. I think I was playing looser on this table, maybe 20/17/3. I could have been tight tho, like 17/12/3, its hard to say. Maybe even 14/12/3.
50NL eff stacks ~$90 Preflop (Delt TT) folds to villian, who opens 1.75, I repop in BB to ~6.50, he calls. Flop 985 (Pot ~$13) I bet $9, he calls. Turn 7 (Pot ~$31) checked through River 6 bet fold, check call, bet call?, and how big |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL: Really bad spot with deeeep stacks versus nitty
IMO, $25-45.
The only hand that beats you is TJ (unless the board is flush poss) and it's somewhat possible he has this. If you think he's a bad player, he might fall for a large bet thinking you're playing the board. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL: Really bad spot with deeeep stacks versus nitty
I bet 15 and hope he calls for the chop.. you have 2 of the t's, he doesn't have JT.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL: Really bad spot with deeeep stacks versus nitty
shove?? There's a straight on the board and you have the T for the higher straight. Plus there's a lot in the pot and this may seem a desperation shove to steal it. How often is he gonna have JT seriously! I say shove this, or am I missing something?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL: Really bad spot with deeeep stacks versus nitty
[ QUOTE ]
shove?? There's a straight on the board and you have the T for the higher straight. Plus there's a lot in the pot and this may seem a desperation shove to steal it. How often is he gonna have JT seriously! I say shove this, or am I missing something? [/ QUOTE ] 90 dollar stacks, decent player who would check the turn with marginal hands and draws. I don't know how often he bets an overpair on the turn. My range is probably wider than his but its hard to say. I think I need to bet the turn as a bluff. River I bet $30, I think he gets scared and calls with his overpairs and probably doesn't raise w/o a flush. He almost never has a ten so I don't htink worrying about the split is a big deal. Really sucks if he shoves a set, but IMO he doesn't check turn with a set ever. I dunno, river makes my head spin still. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL: Really bad spot with deeeep stacks versus nitty
huh? it changes things if there is a flush possible.. why does it suck if he shoves a set.. you have the 2nd nuts? obviously your board is messed up if this isn't the case.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL: Really bad spot with deeeep stacks versus nitty
[ QUOTE ]
huh? it changes things if there is a flush possible.. why does it suck if he shoves a set.. you have the 2nd nuts? obviously your board is messed up if this isn't the case. [/ QUOTE ] obviously b.c. I'm bet/folding since I think he bets that turn with a set such a high % that he should have a flush here. You rather bet/call? flush hit on the river. EDIT: [censored] I screwed this post up. Yeah flush hit on the river too. Only reason its interesting. I obviously don' tbet fold if a flush wasn't possible. Flop had two of one suit on it, it hit on the river. I will probably repost this ina couple days for better responses :/. I hate screwing major details up like that in the OP. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL: Really bad spot with deeeep stacks versus nitty
Do you he would call your cbet for a shot at a flush draw? I suppose its possible due to the deepness of stacks.
I think you should value bet the river for a half pot and vomit if youre raised. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL: Really bad spot with deeeep stacks versus nitty
Dont know, I think spots where I have second nuts are great..
Anyway.. Bet half. I probably fold to a push. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL: Really bad spot with deeeep stacks versus nitty
I think you need to put suits up since it seems like you're analyzing based on teh fact that a flush is possible and everyone else is based on the (incorrect) fact that no flush is possible.
|
|
|