![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is the SNGWIZ Opponent Hand Range Modeling accurate?
I'm asking about where I have created a custom opponent model that fits a certain opponent well. Does SNGWIZ do a good job interpolating that information into non-standard siuations. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A lot of us don't have sngwiz. Try posting some specific examples (showing hand ranges) and I'm sure you would get some responses.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think you can get a good model, since every player you face is different. It is not perfect, but it is a great tool! ...but you still need to think about variables on your own...
At a minimum, I look at every hand that SNGW says was wrong or close, and then I go into the details and adjust my opponents ranges accordingly. I do this everyday. I am going to start doing it after every set so I can remember my opponents play, ranges, etc. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I am going to start doing it after every set so I can remember my opponents play, ranges, etc. [/ QUOTE ] That is a solid plan. I recently picked up sngw and thats what I have been doing as well. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If I were to play using solely the advice from SNGWiz with good oppoent modeling _in real time_ on $55 SnG's would that be profitable or a losing proposition?
I've been playing the $55's a bit and have been turning a profit, but now after starting with SNGWiz I'm asking myself if SNGWiz would fare better than I am faring. Which feels sick. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
If I were to play using solely the advice from SNGWiz with good oppoent modeling _in real time_ on $55 SnG's would that be profitable or a losing proposition? I've been playing the $55's a bit and have been turning a profit, but now after starting with SNGWiz I'm asking myself if SNGWiz would fare better than I am faring. Which feels sick. [/ QUOTE ] Nah, I'm probably missing something. Playing SNG's can't possibly be so easy that it can be done by a small ICM application |
![]() |
|
|