#1
|
|||
|
|||
very thin value bet
I'm still trying to figure out how how this is a wise value bet by luclongley. I know these nosebleed stakes are way out of my league, but this bet at the end seems way too thin. Anyone have any ideas on his thinking process here?
Full Tilt Poker Game #2442955322: Table Halbert (heads up) - $300/$600 - No Limit Hold'em - 0:03:41 ET - 2007/05/17 Seat 1: LucLongley ($230,184.40) Seat 2: David Benyamine ($142,266) LucLongley posts the small blind of $300 David Benyamine posts the big blind of $600 The button is in seat #1 *** HOLE CARDS *** LucLongley raises to $1,800 David Benyamine calls $1,200 *** FLOP *** [Ah 3c 4c] David Benyamine checks LucLongley bets $3,000 David Benyamine raises to $10,800 LucLongley calls $7,800 *** TURN *** [Ah 3c 4c] [5s] David Benyamine has 15 seconds left to act David Benyamine bets $15,000 LucLongley calls $15,000 *** RIVER *** [Ah 3c 4c 5s] [7s] David Benyamine has 15 seconds left to act David Benyamine checks LucLongley has 15 seconds left to act LucLongley bets $43,800 David Benyamine calls $43,800 *** SHOW DOWN *** LucLongley shows [Ad 5c] (two pair, Aces and Fives) David Benyamine mucks LucLongley wins the pot ($142,799.50) with two pair, Aces and Fives *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $142,800 | Rake $0.50 Board: [Ah 3c 4c 5s 7s] Seat 1: LucLongley (small blind) collected ($142,799.50) Seat 2: David Benyamine (big blind) mucked |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: very thin value bet
DB never checks a straight on the river and LL can rep missed clubs. Also DB is not very good (for these stakes) and is a severe calling station.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: very thin value bet
I was thinking more along the line of DB having a set. Wouldn't it be highly possible that DB would just let LL bet into him and then just call with a set on that board?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: very thin value bet
Possible. But there are more two pair combos than set combos. And he'd be more likely to vb a set on the river than to c/c. Of course this is all speculation... doesn't seem like such a crazy hand, though.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: very thin value bet
I expected AQ or something, this isn't thin at all....
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: very thin value bet
[ QUOTE ]
I expected AQ or something, this isn't thin at all.... [/ QUOTE ] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: very thin value bet
my bad, I just thought that 7 was a really bad card for LL. I don't really watch db play, I just happened to open up that table the hand before and watched this hand take place and was like "seriously?!?"
So I'll ask another question, is a call with AQ on that river a profitable one in the long run? this is if you include it being HU playing LL with these deep stacks. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: very thin value bet
[ QUOTE ]
So I'll ask another question, is a call with AQ on that river a profitable one in the long run? [/ QUOTE ] ban pls |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: very thin value bet
why is that a ban? I'm trying to understand nosebleed stakes table dynamics cuz it is completely different from 5/10.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: very thin value bet
[ QUOTE ]
I expected AQ or something, this isn't thin at all.... [/ QUOTE ] |
|
|