did we do the whole MSpaint and ragging on this guy yet ?

[rafiki]

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...0&fpart=all

because I laughed out louad about 5 times reading the first post, and think the jokes in there are like 4 meta levels higher then most 2+2ers probably thought. hahaha genius !

[bmwguy525]

BBV4L doesn't care about poker strategy

unless it's this

POKERSTARS GAME #7469740355: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($5/$10) - 2006/12/16 - 15:19:51 (ET)
Table 'Peneleos' 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 4: Dalmations ($597 in chips)
Seat 5: Lukieplaya ($4614 in chips)
Seat 6: gambler2k4 ($995 in chips)
Lukieplaya: posts small blind $5
gambler2k4: posts big blind $10
__2cb__: sits out
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Lukieplaya [4d As]
Dalmations: folds
Lukieplaya: raises $30 to $40
gambler2k4: raises $100 to $140
Longhorne joins the table at seat #2
Lukieplaya: raises $4474 to $4614 and is all-in
gambler2k4: calls $855 and is all-in
*** FLOP *** [8h 2d 3h]
*** TURN *** [8h 2d 3h] [6d]
*** RIVER *** [8h 2d 3h 6d] [2h]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Lukieplaya: shows [4d As] (a pair of Deuces)
gambler2k4: mucks hand
Lukieplaya collected $1989 from pot

[BowToYourSensei]

[ QUOTE ]
BBV4L doesn't care about poker strategy

unless it's this

POKERSTARS GAME #7469740355: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($5/$10) - 2006/12/16 - 15:19:51 (ET)
Table 'Peneleos' 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 4: Dalmations ($597 in chips)
Seat 5: Lukieplaya ($4614 in chips)
Seat 6: gambler2k4 ($995 in chips)
Lukieplaya: posts small blind $5
gambler2k4: posts big blind $10
__2cb__: sits out
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Lukieplaya [4d As]
Dalmations: folds
Lukieplaya: raises $30 to $40
gambler2k4: raises $100 to $140
Longhorne joins the table at seat #2
Lukieplaya: raises $4474 to $4614 and is all-in
gambler2k4: calls $855 and is all-in
*** FLOP *** [8h 2d 3h]
*** TURN *** [8h 2d 3h] [6d]
*** RIVER *** [8h 2d 3h 6d] [2h]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Lukieplaya: shows [4d As] (a pair of Deuces)
gambler2k4: mucks hand
Lukieplaya collected $1989 from pot

[/ QUOTE ]

bmwguy you are such an annoying troll

[rafiki]

"BBV4L doesn't care about poker strategy"

if you read the thread I linked, and manage to not laugh in it once, I'll ship you 5W$

[bmwguy525]

huh? why the hating yo

[rafiki]

ok ok I'll paste a sample:

"Sklansky had it right, but this is where he failed.
A6 is supposedly dominant over K7, but A*6 = 84 and K*7 = 91. A difference of 7 by numerical advantage.
You may be wondering how this is possible, how could K*7 be dominant over A*6?
You are brainwashed by Sklansky and the sheep that treat his books like the Bible and his rankings like the ten commanments!
You are the same person who cusses "HOW THE F*CK DID MY A9 GET BUSTED BY QJ, WTF?!", screams, and throws a fit every time he is "supposed to win" because you had a "dominant hand" (according to Sklansky!)

Poker, at it's very fundamental, is a game of MATH and LUCK.
MATH and LUCK are similar, but very different at the same time.
MATH depends on Raw Numbers, Logic, and Reason to succeed.
LUCK relies on pure Randomness, Chance, and the Synchronicity of numbers to succeed.
Synchronicity is the key word, and I will explain that now.

Synchronicity is where the cards align together harmoniously. K7 is more synchronous than A6 for one simple fact."

[BowToYourSensei]

[ QUOTE ]
huh? why the hating yo

[/ QUOTE ]

cuz BBV doesn't care about strategy

[THEOSU]

[ QUOTE ]
"BBV4L doesn't care about poker strategy"

if you read the thread I linked, and manage to not laugh in it once, I'll ship you 5W$

[/ QUOTE ]


i did not laugh in it once. ship the really fake, but still useful monies.

[rafiki]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
"BBV4L doesn't care about poker strategy"

if you read the thread I linked, and manage to not laugh in it once, I'll ship you 5W$

[/ QUOTE ]


i did not laugh in it once. ship the really fake, but still useful monies.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well for starters I was talking to bmw...

[bmwguy525]

Well i didn't laugh once either, so ship the really fake, but still useful monies