Collusion at FT of 109r?

[ZJ123]

PokerStars Game #9739385468: Tournament #48888293, $100+$9 Hold'em No Limit - Level XX (10000/20000) - 2007/05/04 - 01:14:07 (ET)
Table '48888293 10' 9-max Seat #8 is the button
Seat 2: aimerif (643961 in chips)
Seat 3: frostey (222168 in chips)
Seat 5: Rizen (241487 in chips)
Seat 8: Reno_Jones (193384 in chips)
aimerif: posts the ante 1000
frostey: posts the ante 1000
Rizen: posts the ante 1000
Reno_Jones: posts the ante 1000
aimerif: posts small blind 10000
frostey: posts big blind 20000
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Rizen: folds
Reno_Jones: folds
aimerif: raises 80000 to 100000
frostey: raises 121168 to 221168 and is all-in
aimerif: folds
frostey collected 204000 from pot
frostey: doesn't show hand
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 204000 | Rake 0
Seat 2: aimerif (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: frostey (big blind) collected (204000)
Seat 5: Rizen folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: Reno_Jones (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)




o yeah and there from the same city.

[timex]

I'm honestly going to say yes on this one.

[bigballz]

i havnt read post yet, only the title.

Probobly

[bigballz]

100%

[misclick odds]

and they finished 1/2

[RonFezBuddy]

wouldn't it make sense for the chip dumping to go in the other direction though?

[ASPoker8]

[ QUOTE ]
wouldn't it make sense for the chip dumping to go in the other direction though?

[/ QUOTE ]

No, they want to be 1-2 in chips wayyy ahead of the other dudes rather than just one of them wayyy ahead

[ASPoker8]

Also, obv collusion

[GSykes]

[ QUOTE ]
wouldn't it make sense for the chip dumping to go in the other direction though?

[/ QUOTE ]

no

[timex]

[ QUOTE ]
wouldn't it make sense for the chip dumping to go in the other direction though?

[/ QUOTE ]

If you and some friends ever want to play a SNG with me...