#1
|
|||
|
|||
Top two limped pot
Villain is 34/22/7 over 60 hands.
Full Tilt Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.25/$0.50 Blinds - 6 Players - (LegoPoker HH Converter) SB: $62.10 <font color="black">Hero (BB): $98.80</font> UTG: $29 MP: $77.30 CO: $48.50 BTN: $44.75 <font color="black">Preflop:</font> Hero is dealt J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (6 Players) UTG folds, MP calls $0.50, 2 folds, SB calls $0.25, Hero checks <font color="black">Flop:</font> ($1.50) 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (3 Players) SB checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $1.50</font>, MP calls $1.50, <font color="red">SB raises to $5</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $18</font>, MP folds, <font color="red">SB raises to $38</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises all-in to $98.30</font> This is fine right? My thinking was he should never have a set here, because 22-77 would lead this drawy board |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top two limped pot
i like it goot, now race those cluuuuuubs
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top two limped pot
given his stats i think he is able to complete in sb with any two.
there are 12 combinations of weaker two pair, and only 5 combinations of sets. Also considering possible draws i like to play for stacks. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top two limped pot
Does an aggression factor of 7 mean this guy would min 4-bet a draw like this?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top two limped pot
I think you're wrong about him never having a set, because this board is less coordinated than you seem to think.
That said, I think this hand is played fine. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top two limped pot
Ok thanks guys. Grunch, there are two straight flush draws which is good enough for me to count as drawy.
Anyways he had 22 (no this isn't a bad beat post) which surprised the hell out of me, I thought for sure I'd be up against J2 or 72 or some draw. Just goes to show that PA-HUD is the devil, because I ruled out sets almost entirely based on his aggro level. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top two limped pot
I don't think you should ever discount sets (without a specific read) when villain in first position check raises with 3 or more people seeing the flop.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top two limped pot
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think you should ever discount sets (without a specific read) when villain in first position check raises with 3 or more people seeing the flop. [/ QUOTE ] |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top two limped pot
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think you should ever discount sets (without a specific read) when villain in first position check raises with 3 or more people seeing the flop. [/ QUOTE ] but I'd rather blame PA-HUD! [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] |
|
|