bonus or rakeback

[poker12]

anyone know if it is better to get 25% rakeback (contributed) at ongame or clear the 9k bonuses (contributed points) they run?

any ongame members in the house? tried to figure it out but have no clue...

Player Points

[Beck]

Go with the bonus. When a site offers a bonus that willalways be more profitable than the rakeback it is offering.

And 25% contributed?? Sounds really sheity if you ask me.
There are a bunch of ongame sites out there, with frequent reloads. Find it hard to believe it should be necessary to ever play there withou working of a bonus.

For comparison, a friend of mine played some 100nl full ring.
With a vpip of 28% that came to about 62% rakeack (dealt method) on a 7X bonus. A 9X bonus would be somethinglike 50% dealt rakeback.

[wade17]

i would think rakeback

[sweeng8]

i played online exclusively until they changed their points system. Hollywood poker used to be best for bonuses, and I also played at eurobet to get rakeback. Since they have made it played hands only get points, its super hard to clear playing full ring games as i do, even at 1/2 and 2/4. The best ongame site around at moment is tower gaming which offers $200 bonus (x5) and you can find 30% rakeback as well. Besides this however, i think ongame have screwed a lot of people who play there. Im moving to mansion as soon as i can get my money changed