Party NL100 SH player looking for a new site

[Rabenstein]

Hi,

ive read quite a bit of posts in this subforum, but still i hope you can give me some advice in case i missed something.

The perfect site would have good constant rakeback and/or reloads, decent software (resizeable, supporting PT and PokerAce) and soft games on NL100/NL200 SH.

I tend to FTP, any other suggestions?

Thanks

[coolmoedee]

I would suggest www.pokercritic.com and just read their reviews. They are very good and they offer a lot of sites.

[Bobo Fett]

[ QUOTE ]
I would suggest www.pokercritic.com and just read their reviews. They are very good and they offer a lot of sites.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not sure if you're spamming, or just don't know what you're talking about, but that is TERRIBLE advice. Absolute Poker - 44/50, including a 9 for service and 9 for promotions. Doyle's Room - 45/50, 9 for everything. CD, Fair, and Titan all got a 10 for players, but Noble gets an 8...they're on the same network! Apparently Party's players are more skilled than Empire's as well. I could keep going, but I assume you get the idea.

Edit to add: Also, the site doesn't address ANY of the OP's questions - rakeback, reloads, resizeable software, PT/PA support, or softness of games on a given level.

OP: First question always with posts like yours - American or not?

[Rabenstein]

Nope, German. The only sites i cant sign up to is some british ones like William Hill.

[Audi]

[ QUOTE ]
The perfect site would have good constant rakeback and/or reloads, decent software (resizeable, supporting PT and PokerAce) and soft games on NL100/NL200 SH.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd probably go with Ongame...softish SH (though 5max), constant freeloads at sites like Tower, RedKings and PokerLoco....with RB unofficially available.

Poor software is the downside, though PT compliant.