Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > High Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-29-2007, 04:55 PM
PHiLLeDINGUE PHiLLeDINGUE is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: No MORe tilting Da house Yo
Posts: 251
Default strickly NL speeking..

If we're only talking about NL cash game with AT LEAST 100BBs(agst non mediocre players, that wont stack off with middle pair)from the BTN all folds to you 6 handed.
How would you rank (and how do you find those results) :


- K7o type of hands ( K3o Q5o... )Ko-Qo
- J3s type of hands ( Q2s J3s... )Qs-Js-Ts
- 73o type of hands ( 57o 94o... )2 low off suit connected or not

If you don't understand, In the long run, would you expect to make more(or loose less) money raising a K5o or an J2s ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-29-2007, 05:36 PM
HERE_2_gamble_ HERE_2_gamble_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 590
Default Re: strickly NL speeking..

Obv everyone knows so many other things apply, but generally speaking id put them in this order.

- J3s type of hands ( Q2s J3s... )Qs-Js-Ts
- 73o type of hands ( 57o 94o... )2 low off suit connected or not
- K7o type of hands ( K3o Q5o... )Ko-Qo

I think its quite close actually. but its the order that will be most profitable for your game.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-29-2007, 05:37 PM
THE JUICE THE JUICE is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 212
Default Re: strickly NL speeking..

this depends a lot on your game and ev probably varies depending on different players images
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-29-2007, 06:54 PM
berserk berserk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,676
Default Re: strickly NL speeking..

Can't really group 73o or 94o with 75o imo.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-29-2007, 07:36 PM
Tao_Jones Tao_Jones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 274
Default Re: strickly NL speeking..

You can isolate hands raised from the button in your PT database...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-29-2007, 07:43 PM
Jman28 Jman28 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Banana Thief
Posts: 4,101
Default Re: strickly NL speeking..

J3s, K7o, 73o, I would suspect.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-29-2007, 08:12 PM
AB_illusive AB_illusive is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 130
Default Re: strickly NL speeking..

[ QUOTE ]
J3s, K7o, 73o, I would suspect.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-29-2007, 09:40 PM
RepulseMonkey RepulseMonkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 150
Default Re: strickly NL speeking..

Are you saying that suitedness has more value than High card strength and connectedness in that order ?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-29-2007, 10:27 PM
MorningAfter MorningAfter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: donating roll 2 durrr
Posts: 102
Default Re: strickly NL speeking..

connected > suited > highcard
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-29-2007, 11:08 PM
THE JUICE THE JUICE is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 212
Default Re: strickly NL speeking..

[ QUOTE ]
connected > suited > highcard

[/ QUOTE ]

I think this is right in terms of value b/c if your playing your high pairs when you hit aggressively your not going to do well whereas your straights and high flushes will give you more value esp. against villians likely ranges
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.