Rake on party vs pokerstars

[Soeren]

I play 2$/4$ six max

my pokertracker tells me i am paying following rake
Pokerstars: 0,084$ / hand
Party: 0,115$ / hand
Full-tilt: 0,097 / hand
I poker: 0,130 / hand

Are my calculations correct are party that much more expensive than pokerstars ????

And are your numbers the same.

[CountingMyOuts]

Your numbers fall within what I would expect. Stars rake is the best at $2/4 (because $3 is not taken until the pot hits $70) and Party has always been one of the highest raking sites around.

[Pokeraddict]

A $30 pot at Stars and Full Tilt would only have a $1 rake where Party and iPoker would be $1.50. At $50 FT and Stars would be $2 but Party and iPoker $2.50 and also as mentioned Stars does not take $3 until $70 where the others take it at $60.

[Stake Monster]

according to my PT, at 50NL on Party I pay 0.03c/hand, while on UB I paid 0.027c/hand. So about 9-10% difference.

[Pokeraddict]

[ QUOTE ]
according to my PT, at 50NL on Party I pay 0.03c/hand, while on UB I paid 0.027c/hand. So about 9-10% difference.

[/ QUOTE ]

The rake is the same on both sites for no limit isn't it? The difference is likely bigger avg. pot.

[Stake Monster]

not sure, just contributing my numbers for the sake of science :P

I haven't noticed a difference yet

[poker345]

i see it is 3rake on 60 at stars. where did you see the 70 as cap?

[Chips Ahoy]

[ QUOTE ]
i see it is 3rake on 60 at stars. where did you see the 70 as cap?

[/ QUOTE ]

They play limit ($3 at 70) and you play NL ($3 at 60)?

Pokerstars rake

[gameplay]

yes thats it ty