|
|
#3
02-16-2006, 05:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 1-table SNG Poll - 3 options
[ QUOTE ]
How about we just wait until we can actually play in the new SNG's before making up our mind? [/ QUOTE ] 
|
|
#4
02-16-2006, 05:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party 1-table SNG Poll - 3 options
[ QUOTE ]
How about we just wait until we can actually play in the new SNG's before making up our mind? [/ QUOTE ] Agreed, I just thought since Party is actually present and responding to feedback today it was a good opportunity to get some initial thoughts to them
|
|
#5
02-16-2006, 05:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party 1-table SNG Poll - 3 options
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] How about we just wait until we can actually play in the new SNG's before making up our mind? [/ QUOTE ] Agreed, I just thought since Party is actually present and responding to feedback today it was a good opportunity to get some initial thoughts to them [/ QUOTE ] And our initial thoughts should be a guess? You're clever!!
|
|
#6
02-16-2006, 05:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party 1-table SNG Poll - 3 options
where is the 5 minute lvl choice?
|
|
#7
02-16-2006, 05:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party 1-table SNG Poll - 3 options
[ QUOTE ]
And our initial thoughts should be a guess? You're clever!! [/ QUOTE ] A large number of people seem to feel they are able and willing to offer their opinion now. I am one of them, obviously you're not. You're welcome to disagree and put forth that you need to try the new timed structure first. However, at 1st guess it looks like a very large share of the posters in the 1-table forum already have a strong opinion one way or another. I don't think that makes them ill-informed or overly hasty. It's just people's opinions. "Sarcasm is the defense of the weak-winded"
|
|
#8
02-16-2006, 05:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party 1-table SNG Poll - 3 options
[ QUOTE ]
where is the 5 minute lvl choice? [/ QUOTE ] Good point. I was really just curious to see if most 2+2ers that feel they have a preference already wanted a) timed SNG levels b) SNGs levels based on hands I could have made that clearer in the poll and/or offered more options I guess, but point taken.
|
|
#9
02-16-2006, 05:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party 1-table SNG Poll - 3 options
I don't think the response to this poll will be accurate. I have a feeling that the people that want shorter stacks and levels by hand count will be more apt to vote. Those who are upset tend to be the ones who speak out the most.
|
|
#10
02-16-2006, 05:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party 1-table SNG Poll - 3 options
Ill answer
Timed... because when it gets short handed, the blinds go up way too fast with the # of hands structure. This is a crucial part in the sng, and when the blinds get to a certain point it essentially becomes a pushing fest which lowers a typical 2+2er's edge.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
