#1
|
|||
|
|||
Full Tilt or Poker Stars
Which is easier to win in the micro limits NLH cash games?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full Tilt or Poker Stars
Id SAy PS but there both Micro so competition shouldn't be too hard.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full Tilt or Poker Stars
Both games are just as beatable...
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full Tilt or Poker Stars
Thanks oober, but one or the other. I'd say stars.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full Tilt or Poker Stars
Because of the massive ammount of ads in Europe, a lot of Fish plays on Stars (and they even give them free $5).
So definately Stars. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full Tilt or Poker Stars
PARTY
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full Tilt or Poker Stars
Take into consideration that FTP has 27% rb. That's ~1.5bb/100 at $50nl (over my 25k hand sample), so do you think Stars games are that much better to add an extra 1.5bb/100?
I know they have the FPP, but that doesn't kick in for a while, and I'm not sure it's worth anything at low stakes. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full Tilt or Poker Stars
Stars because you can play longer, due to it looking nicer.
You shouldn't have trouble beating any micro limits no matter where you go though. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full Tilt or Poker Stars
[ QUOTE ]
Stars because you can play longer, due to it looking nicer. You shouldn't have trouble beating any micro limits no matter where you go though. [/ QUOTE ] Fulltilt's has got nice avatars too. I like FT more than PS. And yes, the 27% rakeback. The game is definitely beatable at that level. Seems pretty similar at both sites. Plus, Fulltilt has 100% bonus up to $600. Now, that's some bad beat insurance. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full Tilt or Poker Stars
Yeh but it takes 10 years to get the whole bonus at the micros. Still better just because of the rakeback. Rakeback is by far one of the most important aspects to building a roll.
|
|
|