Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-17-2007, 12:35 AM
Collude Collude is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 88
Default Logic Behind Security Deposits for Apartments

Ok I understand if you wreck the place etc any damges done would be taken from that money. But what I don't get is this.

My apartment replaces all carpet and repaints when someone moves out. So why would they charge me for damages to the rug when they was replacing it anyways.

Now I know it's just because they want to make money from every possible angle. But is their any logic behind this besides them trying to scam people out of money?

If the carpet is being replaced anyways why should the renter have to pay for the carpet that has stains thats getting torned out anyways?

I'm not in this situation I'm just thinking fo the future
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-17-2007, 12:43 AM
edfurlong edfurlong is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stabbing your probiscus
Posts: 13,711
Default Re: Logic Behind Security Deposits for Apartments

They replace the carpet every time? That seems odd.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-17-2007, 12:47 AM
soapstar soapstar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 196
Default Re: Logic Behind Security Deposits for Apartments

[ QUOTE ]
Ok I understand if you wreck the place etc any damges done would be taken from that money. But what I don't get is this.

My apartment replaces all carpet and repaints when someone moves out. So why would they charge me for damages to the rug when they was replacing it anyways.

Now I know it's just because they want to make money from every possible angle. But is their any logic behind this besides them trying to scam people out of money?

If the carpet is being replaced anyways why should the renter have to pay for the carpet that has stains thats getting torned out anyways?

I'm not in this situation I'm just thinking fo the future

[/ QUOTE ]

Is this an ultra high-end building? I've never heard of an owner replacing carpets every time, I certainly wouldn't do it in any of my places.

They're charging you because it's in the contact you signed, and because they can. In real estate you try to make as much money as possible, same as any other business. Perhaps the carpet is being used in another application.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-17-2007, 12:48 AM
stabn stabn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: eatin ur taco
Posts: 9,680
Default Re: Logic Behind Security Deposits for Apartments

They charge you because it lowers their costs.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-17-2007, 12:53 AM
TwoOuter TwoOuter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 205
Default Re: Logic Behind Security Deposits for Apartments

In many states (such as CA) this may not hold up in court. Owners may only deduct the depreciated cost of the carpet.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-17-2007, 01:41 AM
ThaSaltCracka ThaSaltCracka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Team Slayer!
Posts: 24,282
Default Re: Logic Behind Security Deposits for Apartments

I have never heard of them pulling the carpet up unless its [censored]. I thought they used part of the deposit to clean the carpets, change the locks, and fix any minor damage?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-17-2007, 02:20 AM
JolIIIlIl__iL JolIIIlIl__iL is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 10
Default Re: Logic Behind Security Deposits for Apartments

[ QUOTE ]
They charge you because it lowers their costs.

[/ QUOTE ]
I[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]stabn
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-17-2007, 02:56 AM
TwoOuter TwoOuter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 205
Default Re: Logic Behind Security Deposits for Apartments

I've always understood that deposits were used to cover damages beyond normal wear and tear, cleaning costs, and unpaid rent and late fees.

If a tenant damaged a new carpet such that it had to be replaced, or if the owner chose to replace carpets after every turnover, in my area the owner can only charge a pro-rated amount of the cost of the original carpet.

Generally, a carpet is considered to have a useful life of 5-7 years in rental properties depending on the type of carpet. So if a tenant lived in a unit for 2 years, and destroyed a carpet with a useful life of 5 years, the owner could only deduct 3/5 the cost of the carpet.

In my experience, landlords do this kind of thing because tenants do not always know their rights.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.