Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > MTT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-16-2006, 12:51 AM
Proofrock Proofrock is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Etherized upon a table
Posts: 1,384
Default finally, i post a hand where my play is *not* weak-tight

MP1 had been playing very aggressively, UTG was playing very ... weird, by which I mean sometimes very aggressive with weak hands in strange spots, other times very passive with strong hands.

What do you think?

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t400 (9 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

CO (t18370)
Button (t3425)
SB (t10920)
Hero (t20095)
UTG (t6400)
UTG+1 (t2445)
MP1 (t38255)
MP2 (t16525)
MP3 (t26245)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
UTG calls t400, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP1 raises to t1200</font>, <font color="#666666">4 folds</font>, SB calls t1000, Hero calls t800, <font color="#CC3333">UTG raises to t6400</font>, MP1 folds, SB folds, Hero calls t5175.

Final Pot: t14750
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-16-2006, 12:53 AM
A_C_Slater A_C_Slater is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Run, hide, the Highland way.
Posts: 4,608
Default Re: finally, i post a hand where my play is *not* weak-tight

You're right, it certainly isn't weak tight.

You are now a calling station.

(Actually getting 2 to 1 though, so I guess it's not so bad.)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-16-2006, 01:20 AM
betgo betgo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 15,430
Default Re: finally, i post a hand where my play is *not* weak-tight

[ QUOTE ]
You're right, it certainly isn't weak tight.

You are now a calling station.

(Actually getting 2 to 1 though, so I guess it's not so bad.)

[/ QUOTE ]

Horrible calling station play. Fold to the first raise.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-16-2006, 01:23 AM
Proofrock Proofrock is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Etherized upon a table
Posts: 1,384
Default Re: finally, i post a hand where my play is *not* weak-tight

[ QUOTE ]
Horrible calling station play. Fold to the first raise.

[/ QUOTE ]

So there's 1 person left to act after me, and I'm currently getting 1200+1200+800 + antes : 800, or 4:1 on a call. If UTG calls (as expected), then I'm getting 5:1 pot odds. Do I really want to fold here?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-16-2006, 01:45 AM
betgo betgo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 15,430
Default Re: finally, i post a hand where my play is *not* weak-tight

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Horrible calling station play. Fold to the first raise.

[/ QUOTE ]

So there's 1 person left to act after me, and I'm currently getting 1200+1200+800 + antes : 800, or 4:1 on a call. If UTG calls (as expected), then I'm getting 5:1 pot odds. Do I really want to fold here?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, fold! You are getting great pot odds, but it is a multiway pot. Getting 4-1 in a 4-way pot is not great. Plus you don't know if the pot is going to be reraised. Gigabet might call here, but I sure wouldn't.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-16-2006, 01:52 AM
A_C_Slater A_C_Slater is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Run, hide, the Highland way.
Posts: 4,608
Default Re: finally, i post a hand where my play is *not* weak-tight

Regarding the first call. It's less than 5% of his stack. If MP1 or you had &gt;16,000 then it's an easy fold. But the stacks are deep enough and the implied odds are high enough with this connector to make this call. Though is would be nicer if it was sooted.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-16-2006, 01:59 AM
betgo betgo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 15,430
Default Re: finally, i post a hand where my play is *not* weak-tight

[ QUOTE ]
Regarding the first call. It's less than 5% of his stack. If MP1 or you had &gt;16,000 then it's an easy fold. But the stacks are deep enough and the implied odds are high enough with this connector to make this call. Though is would be nicer if it was sooted.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think folding an unsuited connector to a raise would be terrible here.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-16-2006, 02:08 AM
Scary_Tiger Scary_Tiger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,590
Default Re: finally, i post a hand where my play is *not* weak-tight

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Regarding the first call. It's less than 5% of his stack. If MP1 or you had &gt;16,000 then it's an easy fold. But the stacks are deep enough and the implied odds are high enough with this connector to make this call. Though is would be nicer if it was sooted.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think folding an unsuited connector to a raise would be terrible here.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not bad to call though.

I'd fold the second time around though.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-16-2006, 06:51 PM
Proofrock Proofrock is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Etherized upon a table
Posts: 1,384
Default Re: finally, i post a hand where my play is *not* weak-tight

So apparently this isn't too interesting -- i assume it's either obviously bad or pretty standard.

I need to be about 34% to win this hand and have it be +cEV. If UTG's range is 88+,AK,KQs,AQ, i'm about 27% to win. If his range is any pair, AJ+,KQ, then I'm getting about the right pot odds for it to be cEV neutral.

If I fold, I have a larger than average stack. If I call and lose, I've lost 25% of my stack and have a roughly average stack. If I call and win, I add 50% to my stack and have a 2x average stack.

I called figuring that his range was wide-ish (including lower pairs and lots of unpaired high cards), and that dropping from t20k to t15k, though definitely not good, doesn't fundamentally change my chip situation too much, but going from t20k to t30k does.

Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-16-2006, 07:46 PM
NHFunkii NHFunkii is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,268
Default Re: finally, i post a hand where my play is *not* weak-tight

if that's the range you put him on fine, but I would be pretty surprised if it was that wide. Also I don't really buy this chip position stuff. Pretty sure your EV with a 15k stack is really really close to half your EV with a 30k stack.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.