Comments on the debate for online gambling that was just on CNBC?

[Sarge85]

http://www.cnbc.com/id/18092548

Thoughts?

Sarge[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

[KEW]

Would love to see more of these point counter point debates and longer then 5 mins..This one I do believe spoke well for our cause..

[Tofu_boy]

This is great for us. 70% is very high I hope they will spread the words out. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

[Sarge85]

Yeah, I think the exposure alone is good. Much more eyes on CNBC than C-SPAN.

I agree, "our" guy was much better than the other guy. I'm glad his first reponse to the challenges was for the US to get on board and regulate it. Perfect reponse.

Sarge[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

[Grasshopp3r]

It looks like he has some credentials, too.

http://www.lawrencewalters.com/video.php3

[aislephive]

I think our guy did a very nice job presenting our side. The other guy had very poor arguments and didn't come off well at all. I think this interview is a positive thing for us, I like others wish it was longer so all the key points can get addressed thoroughly.

[Sniper]

I believe Lawrence posts here too...

[JOHNY CA$H]

Great interview. The pro-gaming side fared much better, and you could almost feel the host's opinion shift halfway through.

[CompatiblePoker]

Short but sweet. Great clip and made "our side" look good. It's about time Lawrence got some TV coverage.

[Moneyline]

[ QUOTE ]
This is great for us. 70% is very high I hope they will spread the words out. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Was this zogby poll ever substantiated? I remember seeing stories that mentioned this, but I never saw the actual poll anywhere. The poll I did see was the one conducted by Rasmussen, which put public opinion on the issue at 50/50.