#1
|
|||
|
|||
$50+r AK v. minraise and reraise
Minraiser is 35/33 over 30 hands and appears to be cad. UTG+1 is mcst0002, a solid aggressive player.
PokerStars Tournament, Big Blind is t800 with t50 antes (8 handed) Converter on pregopoker.com UTG (t13331) UTG+1 (t51207) Hero (t13895) MP2 (t18735) CO (t7300) Button (t32263) SB (t10464) BB (t20718) Preflop: Hero is in MP1 with A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="red">UTG raises to t1600</font>, <font color="red">UTG+1 raises to t7200</font>, Hero ... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50+r AK v. minraise and reraise
I think your against TT/JJ basically always here. It looks like UTG+1 is trying to isolate and make a raise big enough that it puts him in, so i don't think hes KK/AA here very often at all because he won't make such a huge reraise.
Given the dead money in the pot, can we knowingly accept a race here? I'm a little busy to run the math, as well as a little incompetant. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50+r AK v. minraise and reraise
Agreed. We're racing and slightly behind here. I muck and wait for a better spot. 1) your read on UTG+1 puts real strength in his hand, what in his range are we beating?. 2) we've only got a drawing hand 3) there are still 5 players to act. I'm in the muck here but would re-shove if UTG+1 had folded.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50+r AK v. minraise and reraise
Preety str8 forward fold IMO, calling isnt outta the ? because of the size of the bet from UTG+1 you can preety much guarantee that you are racing here and winning would be nice for your stack... I think even though you are short stacked you have a little time to wait for a better spot then a slight dog for all your chips, you just dont have any FE against this race.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50+r AK v. minraise and reraise
i guess fold without doing the math. if the added money from the first better is enough to make this even EV i might call
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50+r AK v. minraise and reraise
I guess I would fold...
Also taking into account the fact, that UTG might shove this raise if we call, and then we are nearly pot committed if UTG+1 calls/raises again... I don't like this spot, but that's just me... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50+r AK v. minraise and reraise
[ QUOTE ]
I guess I would fold... Also taking into account the fact, that UTG might shove this raise if we call, and then we are nearly pot committed if UTG+1 calls/raises again... I don't like this spot, but that's just me... [/ QUOTE ] well, were NEVER just calling. But hmm, i might shove, he knows the UTG player is short, i think its reallllly close. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50+r AK v. minraise and reraise
UTG raised and UTG+1 made less than a pot sized reraise.
I think you are dominated too often to make a play here, hoping that the overlay makes it marginally +EV |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50+r AK v. minraise and reraise
[ QUOTE ]
Minraiser is 35/33 over 30 hands and appears to be cad. UTG+1 is mcst0002, a solid aggressive player. PokerStars Tournament, Big Blind is t800 with t50 antes (8 handed) Converter on pregopoker.com UTG (t13331) UTG+1 (t51207) Hero (t13895) MP2 (t18735) CO (t7300) Button (t32263) SB (t10464) BB (t20718) Preflop: Hero is in MP1 with A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="red">UTG raises to t1600</font>, <font color="red">UTG+1 raises to t7200</font>, Hero ... [/ QUOTE ] I'm a bit surprised by the answers in this thread. I don't know what 'cad' means but given OR's stats and stack, and RR's stack, I don't see why we wouldn't push here with the overlay. We're getting called every time by RR but there's a lot of money in the pot and we're good against RR's range - it's not like he's encouraging OR or anyone behind to call/push. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50+r AK v. minraise and reraise
"cad" means he's an architect and uses AutoCAD all day... jkjk
i have no clue to be honest |
|
|