Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-29-2007, 06:06 AM
Jouster777 Jouster777 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: LAG right, nit left
Posts: 1,825
Default Speaking of weak tight...

Main villain is solid/conservative and I haven't seen him go wild like this on any dangerous board. Stats 30/6/2. Short stack is unknown.

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

MP ($35.85)
CO ($16.60)
Button ($29.70)
SB ($50.70)
Hero ($77.95)
UTG ($91.50)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, CO calls $0.50, Button calls $0.50, SB completes, Hero checks.

Flop: ($2) 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $1.5</font>, CO calls $1.50, Button folds, SB calls $1.50.

Turn: ($6.50) 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $4.5</font>, CO calls $4.50, <font color="#CC3333">SB raises to $20.5</font>, Hero calls $16, CO calls $10.10 (All-In).

River: ($62.10) 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players, 1 all-in)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">SB bets $28.2 (All-In)</font>, Hero folds.

Final Pot: $90.30
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-29-2007, 06:12 AM
Supwithbates Supwithbates is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,606
Default Re: Speaking of weak tight...

why are you calling turn if you're folding river? The scarecard is on the turn, I don't see anything new coming to light on the river, and I'm not sure what kind of action you expected to go on the river after how the turn went
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-29-2007, 06:19 AM
Jouster777 Jouster777 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: LAG right, nit left
Posts: 1,825
Default Re: Speaking of weak tight...

Very good question...looks really stupid.

I have 300 hands on this guy. He's very ABC and I could see him betting turn with trips but not pushing with them after two calls. At least that was my thinking at the time.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-29-2007, 06:30 AM
bozzer bozzer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: in with the 2p2 lingo
Posts: 2,140
Default Re: Speaking of weak tight...

well the river is a scary card to a guy with trips since any 7 now beats you. so the river push might confirm that the guy has a boat. if you think this guy would never stack off with trips on this board I suppose this is a good fold, but I'm very wary of 'good folds' since I am a complete pot odds calling station.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-29-2007, 08:39 AM
Jouster777 Jouster777 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: LAG right, nit left
Posts: 1,825
Default Re: Speaking of weak tight...

[ QUOTE ]
well the river is a scary card to a guy with trips since any 7 now beats you. so the river push might confirm that the guy has a boat. if you think this guy would never stack off with trips on this board I suppose this is a good fold, but I'm very wary of 'good folds' since I am a complete pot odds calling station.

[/ QUOTE ]Good observation...I wish I could say I saw it at the time because it would have made my line a bit more acceptable.

Even though I had a decent read on this guy I think Supwithbates is probably right that turn call is bad if I'm going to fold river...even with a strong read, 300 hands isn't enough.

The results didn't really clarify whether this was a good read or not.

Results in white: <font color="white">Villain had 65s and rivered his boat </font> [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-29-2007, 09:20 AM
ama0330 ama0330 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Crushing
Posts: 5,704
Default Re: Speaking of weak tight...

I think you are push or fold on that turn, its obviously going in on the river anyway. I personally would go broke here quite happily in a limped pot. He could have some lame trips or two pair.

If villain is as solid as you say, hes a total moron for not raising that flop if he has a set, so I cant put him on that.

As played I think you MUST call this river just based on the possibility that SB could be trying to squeeze with a 7 on the turn, thinking you both are still drawing, and now he thinks that his straight has hit on the river even though you've "topped him out". I cant fold this river given odds.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-29-2007, 09:23 AM
ama0330 ama0330 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Crushing
Posts: 5,704
Default Re: Speaking of weak tight...

[ QUOTE ]
Results in white:

[/ QUOTE ]

Two things here:

1. Villain sucks a LOT and you should buddylist him, his flop play is SO SO SO BAD

2. I read super goot [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-29-2007, 09:25 AM
tarheeljks tarheeljks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: stone that the builder refused
Posts: 4,134
Default Re: Speaking of weak tight...

gotta go down w/the ship here.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-29-2007, 09:31 AM
Supwithbates Supwithbates is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,606
Default Re: Speaking of weak tight...

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
well the river is a scary card to a guy with trips since any 7 now beats you. so the river push might confirm that the guy has a boat. if you think this guy would never stack off with trips on this board I suppose this is a good fold, but I'm very wary of 'good folds' since I am a complete pot odds calling station.

[/ QUOTE ]Good observation...I wish I could say I saw it at the time because it would have made my line a bit more acceptable.

Even though I had a decent read on this guy I think Supwithbates is probably right that turn call is bad if I'm going to fold river...even with a strong read, 300 hands isn't enough.

The results didn't really clarify whether this was a good read or not.

Results in white: <font color="white">Villain had 65s and rivered his boat </font> [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
this was actually the first thing I put him on (that or 76) when I read how the hand went down.

My earlier judgment remains. Shove or fold turn, and I'd base the decision on my read, but I lean more towards shove since you've got the nut straight and are stacking 75 as well as trips.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-29-2007, 09:31 AM
Jouster777 Jouster777 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: LAG right, nit left
Posts: 1,825
Default Re: Speaking of weak tight...

[ QUOTE ]
1. Villain sucks a LOT and you should buddylist him, his flop play is SO SO SO BAD

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah...my read on him changed a bit after that. I think he knew it was a terrible flop call though as after I said "NH" [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] in chat he felt the need to explain it without prompting: "I only came along on the flop because (shorty) was in".
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.