|
|
#1
03-24-2007, 04:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I think he has Aces (not a PF KK hand)
My question isn't with how I played this hand, because I feel that it is fine. The question is:
How large do the effective stacks have to be before I should start caring that his play seems pretty suspicious? Villain has been playing 45/18 for the 50 hands I have on him. Full Tilt Poker $0.50/$1 No Limit Hold'em Ring Game 5 Players LegoPoker Hand Converter <font color="black">Stack Sizes</font> UTG: $105.20 Hero (CO): $295.20 BTN: $37.40 SB: $108.35 BB: $164.75 <font color="black">Preflop:</font> J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($1.5, 5 players) UTG folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $4</font>, BTN folds, SB folds, <font color="red">BB raises to $8</font>, Hero calls $4 <font color="black">Flop:</font> A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($16.5, 2 players) BB checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $15</font>, <font color="red">BB raises to $30</font>, Hero calls $15 <font color="black">Turn:</font> A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] [2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]] ($76.5, 2 players) <font color="red">BB bets $50</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises all in to $257.20</font>, BB calls all in for $77.75 Uncalled bet of $129.45 returned to Hero <font color="black">River:</font> A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] [K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]] ($332, 2 players) No action 
|
|
#4
03-24-2007, 04:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I think he has Aces (not a PF KK hand)
[ QUOTE ]
Lol, look at my post full house - river decision, its very similar [/ QUOTE ] No, it isn't at all. OP, I don't think I'm folding this here ever against this opponent. EDIT: I misread the action. Him checking the flop and opening up is top set a LOT. I think you can make a case for just calling the turn and reevaluating on the river. I'd like to think I'm good enough to fold at about~300bb deep.
|
|
#6
03-24-2007, 04:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I think he has Aces (not a PF KK hand)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Lol, look at my post full house - river decision, its very similar [/ QUOTE ] No, it isn't at all. OP, I don't think I'm folding this here ever against this opponent. [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#8
03-24-2007, 04:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I think he has Aces (not a PF KK hand)
[ QUOTE ]
Lol, oracle is a player hater AND a calling station. Check out my post full house - river decision on page 2. Its very much the same [/ QUOTE ] You missed out on lots of $$$ in that hand.
|
|
#9
03-24-2007, 04:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I think he has Aces (not a PF KK hand)
[ QUOTE ]
Lol, oracle is a player hater AND a calling station. Check out my post full house - river decision on page 2. Its very much the same [/ QUOTE ] [hijack] You need to stop letting your ego get involved if you want to learn. These forums are filled with players much better than either you or me, I suggest you listen to them. This post is different from yours because of the bet-sizing and the flop action. In your hand you played it so passively you never really had a chance to see where you were at. In this hand, OP is letting his opponent know he's very strong and yet he is still getting played back at. There is a difference. DUCY? [/hijack]
|
|
#10
03-24-2007, 04:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Aces lol
I agree its suspicious, he minraises pre, check-minraises flop. He likes his hand, no doubt.
But as long as I can see 99 AJ and possibly AK or totally misplayed QQ/KK I would never fold it. I think if you were deeper, say 200BB (just made the number up) you should 3bet the flop and see if he has aces. But even then I couldnt lay it down.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
