Has your online winrate declined after the fall of Party Poker?

[akvsaq]

I'm wondering what a good winrate is these days for 6max.
I see that people use to win 2BB/100 or more a couple of years ago. Has things changed? Are there people here winning at this rate or better over a good sample size?

I usually 4 table 3/6 6m and I'm at 0.93BB/100 over 120,000 hands.

Is this below par?

[jstill]

i used to win a little better than 2bbs/100 on Boss + 40% rb at higher stakes than I play now

now I lose .5bb/100 and get 100% RB even though Im 10x the player knowledge wise I was 6 mos ago (clogged some leaks still got plenty tho).... so there ya go i guess?

[justin]

yup i cant win on wpex either think down little over bb but yeh im now break even player on stars 5-10 lol. Nothing compared to beating every game up until 1-2 by over 1.2 bb and destroying 50 for 1.8 over like 50k hands.

[counterspell]

and how.

[sethypooh21]

Man, so maybe I shouldn't look at getting back in? (I was 2.5 5-tsbling 2/4 over 200k - but that was 18 mos ago, lolz) Though, OT, I just turned some of my unused FPPs from back then into T$1050...go me...

[justin]

how?
1. cant 8+ table anymore as profitably not as good game selection.( I kept doing it + stars fast tables alot less time to act then party im stupid though)
2, I am a showdown monkey
3. Stars is riiggged.
4. MOST IMPORTANTLY Bill Frist is bi-curious

[Oink]

I have only played poker in a year and 6max since July. So I cant really contribute with the "party 10/20 +3BB/100 2years ago" stories.

I do think tho, that the profitability of low stakes 6max is overrated. At 2/4-5/T rake is a serious issue and to my knowledge there is no sites where you can randomly open 8 tables and expect to be a big winner.

With table and site selection I do think low stakes is profitable. One just have to do a better job at finding the tables at the sites with rb, good bonii and with a moderate rake schedule.

I would NEVER play low stakes at sites without rb.