#1
|
|||
|
|||
sklansky\'s world view approves/condones hitler
most of you are worse than me at poker. most of you are worse than me at philosophy. most of you read sh*t on this forum, and are convinced, wrongly. there are 3 posters ive read who appear quasi intelligent, but beyond that, most of you are clearly destroyed eternally. average iq in this section is well below 155. even those above 155 are the freakish type, not philosphically well, but actually secrete worthless thought. in reality, most of you are sub 155. i used to be. but worked on my iq. now im smarter than 99.8% of you, not just 98%. doesnt matter. you will still spring forth awful argument, and unjustified anger. sklansy's system says hitler was not bad. this is irrefutable
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sklansky\'s world view approves/condones hitler
broke my comp this week. upset. played only 2 hrs. had my 1st losing week since nov. i find solace though in my superlative iq, sat scores, philosphical prowess, dominance over victor hu or multi, superiority to sklansky in terms of strict iq, etc. logically, by any measurable test, i am superior to nearly all of you (if not all). yet you all still espouse primordial anti-not ready pro- dawkins rhetoric. mccarthy who gives a [censored]. [censored] all of you sub 2100 chess players. sklansky probably couldnt exceed 2k even if he studied hard for 72 months. he is psuedo
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sklansky\'s world view approves/condones hitler
[ QUOTE ]
broke my comp this week. upset. played only 2 hrs. had my 1st losing week since nov. i find solace though in my superlative iq, sat scores, philosphical prowess, dominance over victor hu or multi, superiority to sklansky in terms of strict iq, etc. logically, by any measurable test, i am superior to nearly all of you (if not all). yet you all still espouse primordial anti-not ready pro- dawkins rhetoric. mccarthy who gives a [censored]. [censored] all of you sub 2100 chess players. sklansky probably couldnt exceed 2k even if he studied hard for 72 months. he is psuedo [/ QUOTE ] Haha you need to get laid so bad its almost ridiculous. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sklansky\'s world view approves/condones hitler
[ QUOTE ]
sklansy's system says hitler was not bad. [/ QUOTE ] wher can i read this? [ QUOTE ] most of you are sub 155 [/ QUOTE ] how many americans are here!? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sklansky\'s world view approves/condones hitler
[ QUOTE ]
most of you are sub 155 [/ QUOTE ] I understand they have no speed limit on German highways and you can go over 155 if you want. PairTheBoard |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sklansky\'s world view approves/condones hitler
I am definitely sub 155. I'm probably sub 140. And around 1800 in chess I think, though I've never studied. I'd kick your arse at PL Omaha/8 though.
Please elaborate re Sklansky/Hitler. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sklansky\'s world view approves/condones hitler
Man. This one really got me mad. I need a break from the forum.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sklansky\'s world view approves/condones hitler
"dominance over victor hu or multi"
hu for rolls???????? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sklansky\'s world view approves/condones hitler
[ QUOTE ]
around 1800 in chess I think, though I've never studied [/ QUOTE ] lol |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sklansky\'s world view approves/condones hitler
What happened to your liquid courage?
You forgot to offer the forum 10 to 1 odds on a chess, poker, or basketball match, only to run away and disappear for a few weeks after someone accepts. Have you switched your booze? |
|
|