Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-20-2007, 09:26 PM
mvdgaag mvdgaag is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Chasing Aces
Posts: 1,022
Default super/system flawed for uNL

For the readers that read super/systems NL holdem advice... It just doesn't work very well for me at uNL. This is because the players do not seem to notice your agression and fail to get into the folding habit. Since the system depends so much on folding equity you are just spewing chips against all these calling stations.
Also because many people buy in very short all the small suited connectors and small pairs are hardly worth playing against any opponent.

What do you guys think?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-20-2007, 09:39 PM
Nsight7 Nsight7 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 496
Default Re: super/system flawed for uNL

Correct . . . so stop spewing chips on fold equity. ^_-
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-20-2007, 09:40 PM
smbruin22 smbruin22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,524
Default Re: super/system flawed for uNL

what's uNL?.... and yes, supersystem is for deep games.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-20-2007, 11:14 PM
TheDivineRod TheDivineRod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 635
Default Re: super/system flawed for uNL

Doyle explains that when playing against weak players, just make a hand and bet it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-21-2007, 05:24 AM
AthenaSpades AthenaSpades is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4
Default Re: super/system flawed for uNL

whats uNL?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-21-2007, 06:46 AM
maybedinero maybedinero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 194
Default Re: super/system flawed for uNL

uNL = Microstakes (The u is supposed to be a (Greek letter) mu which stands for micro). So as in the Micro Stakes forum, 50NL and below.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-21-2007, 10:50 AM
RobNottsUk RobNottsUk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 359
Default Re: super/system flawed for uNL

I actually think there should be deep-stack tables, where 100bb is min. stack to be dealt a hand.

Playing MillerBots running GSiHE-1.0 is not much fun!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-21-2007, 01:03 PM
johnnyrocket johnnyrocket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 8 tabling and raising all donk bets
Posts: 3,679
Default Re: super/system flawed for uNL

supersystem gives you a base line. Obviously you should adjust to the table, if u keep playing this way against calling stations u are just plaina wful and should quit poker.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-21-2007, 02:31 PM
Scientize Scientize is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 39
Default Re: super/system flawed for uNL

"Playing MillerBots running GSiHE-1.0 is not much fun!"

Can you explain this in a little more detail? I mean as far as what you know about the bots and how many you estimate to be around.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-21-2007, 02:53 PM
James81 James81 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 272
Default Re: super/system flawed for uNL

[ QUOTE ]
Doyle explains that when playing against weak players, just make a hand and bet it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thats one point. The other point is, if you play with aggression the other players are not able to play like the should.

I recogniszed that the Smallstack (40 times the BB) is playing too lose. My opinion is that these players want to keep their loses small and buy in only for that amount. Would they play with only the High Cards and big pairs, the never would get in such a trouble the bottom line is the always in such a trouble and throw mostly the good money after the bad money (i hope you understand what i mean).

But you can also play the board. Is there a street possibility or a flush possibility bet big. Look for bets in hands before their fold their cards. Is the bet big. Bet big. is the bet small - you now the rest [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

Your betting strukture must fit into the big puzzel. But you cant expect that a uNL player folds his street against a Full house or Flush possibility! I have such problems too, but I know I am not allone. I would only fold in this example if I am on a playlevel where the other players can fold a big hand. You must now on which thinking level your opponents play. If you see a paired board with a possible street and he makes the pot big and shows to the end the street, you now he call every bet, when he thinks he is best. You now know he is a true callingstation [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.