"Phil Hellmuth's Read Em or Weep" OR "Caro's Book of Poker Tells"

[GaelleLynd]

Which one is the most useful in you guys' opinions?

[Matt Williams]

[ QUOTE ]
Which one is the most useful in you guys' opinions?

[/ QUOTE ]

It depends. Are you using Helmuth's book as a light source to read Caro's book when you burn it?

[Red_Diamond]

One hell of a lot of confusion. Why is it Hellmuth used basically the same title as another poker related book that has been out over a year before it?

You would think there should be something unethical about that. But maybe ethics doesn't fit into Hellmuth's realm very well...

[deacsoft]

[ QUOTE ]
It depends. Are you using Helmuth's book as a light source to read Caro's book when you burn it?

[/ QUOTE ]

Hellmuth only presents the book. He did not write it.

Caro's is considered the best work on tells. I'm still reading Read 'em and Reap.

[bernie]

I liked Caro's better.

Read them both and draw your own conclusions.

You can also use the search function for further reviews.

b

[Bet-and-win88]

Caro's book is crap, Navarro's is less crappy...

[Red_Diamond]

With only 56 posts to your name, is there any sort of (other) credit to this claim?

[Cactus Jack]

I cannot read Navarro's book. I don't really know why. Can't finish it. Can't read more than a couple of pages before going cross-eyed. Caro's book is still the source, imho.

[jdog1999]

I've read Caro's book and it made a big difference when playing with my buddies in the home game. But as you can guess made no difference in online play. FWIW I've heard great things about Navarro's book.

[jeffnc]

I preferred Navarro's book. It just makes more sense.