Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-08-2007, 03:59 PM
tangled tangled is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 318
Default Prima question

tried to find this out by going to micogaming's web site and chatting to manager at battlefield, but still am not sure of the answer.

The question is: when I play at battlefield(prima) could I be playing with people at sites that do not accept ANY US players?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-08-2007, 04:10 PM
Coy_Roy Coy_Roy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: DC/AC
Posts: 727
Default Re: Prima question

Absolutely.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-08-2007, 04:24 PM
tangled tangled is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 318
Default Re: Prima question

[ QUOTE ]
Absolutely.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's what I thought. So, playing at battlefield is one way a US player can have access to some non-US-friendly sites?

Also, why would those sites not go ahead and accept US players as they are still accepting bets from them and thereby have not shielded themselves from the DOJ?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-08-2007, 04:28 PM
Coy_Roy Coy_Roy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: DC/AC
Posts: 727
Default Re: Prima question

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Absolutely.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's what I thought. So, playing at battlefield is one way a US player can have access to some non-US-friendly sites?

Also, why would those sites not go ahead and accept US players as they are still accepting bets from them and thereby have not shielded themselves from the DOJ?

[/ QUOTE ]

Just because they are on the same network doesn't mean that they are in any way involved with their funding and payouts.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-08-2007, 04:36 PM
tangled tangled is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 318
Default Re: Prima question

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Absolutely.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's what I thought. So, playing at battlefield is one way a US player can have access to some non-US-friendly sites?

Also, why would those sites not go ahead and accept US players as they are still accepting bets from them and thereby have not shielded themselves from the DOJ?

[/ QUOTE ]

Just because they are on the same network doesn't mean that they are in any way involved with their funding and payouts.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am not trying to start an argument, but it seems to me that our hyper-aggresive DOJ would say that they still are gaining value from US palyers betting there. I'm not saying that's right but it seems that those non-US-friendly, prima sites are going out of the way to stay clear of legal problems from the US, but really aren't.

Again not trying to argue--jusr curious.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-08-2007, 05:18 PM
Brian O'Nolan Brian O'Nolan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 484
Default Re: Prima question

What I don't understand is why any Prima's are still allowing US players, as it seems like a much smaller % of their business than Stars, UB, or FT.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-08-2007, 09:44 PM
MLSchaff MLSchaff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 352
Default Re: Prima question

Prima rocks. As long as you don't live in one of the banned states, you get to play in an ocean full of eurofishies.

I think that calling the DOJ "hyper-aggressive" is not quite applicable. The DOJ has not yet gone after any internet gambling operation that is not taking sports bets.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.