Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-18-2007, 12:43 PM
NL Newbie NL Newbie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,551
Default $100 Overpair vs passive

<font color="green">31/7/.7 over 270hands 26/66 WTSD/W$SD </font>
Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

BB ($100)
UTG ($45.07)
MP ($189.80)
CO ($239.85)
Button ($73.08)
Hero ($282.45)

Preflop: Hero is SB with A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. Hero posts a blind of $0.50.
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP raises to $4</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero (poster) raises to $12.5</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP calls $9.


Flop: ($27) 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $20</font>, MP calls $20.


Turn: ($67) J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>

Plan? His range?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-18-2007, 12:50 PM
iceit iceit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 83
Default Re: $100 Overpair vs passive

pretty safe board. keep betting into him. his range, small pocket pair, bigger pocket pair and flush draw.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-18-2007, 03:41 PM
Mossberg Mossberg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,824
Default Re: $100 Overpair vs passive

edit: wow nm I suck at reading. Based on stats and his possible range, I think aislephive's stackadonk plan is pretty sexy here.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-18-2007, 03:50 PM
aislephive aislephive is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: And now the children are asleep
Posts: 6,874
Default Re: $100 Overpair vs passive

I'd stackadonk here. He'll likely bet KK/QQ on turn if checked to him and will call a shove a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-18-2007, 03:54 PM
Kermit Kermit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: WIPE ME DOWN!!
Posts: 1,512
Default Re: $100 Overpair vs passive

[ QUOTE ]
I would bet like 45 and fold to a raise.

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

I bet every street. Stackadonk is an option, but against the player described, I just keep betting.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-18-2007, 04:12 PM
dregal dregal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SmartNit
Posts: 1,529
Default Re: $100 Overpair vs passive

AP - do you think that his range is heavily weighted towards QQ/KK?

Personally I think he can have 99+ here as well as a FD, and I don't know that he bets 99,1010, or a FD if tis checked to him (he has a .7 AF). I agree that we can stack-a-donk KK/QQ here, but I think we lose value against the rest of range.

I like leading the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-18-2007, 04:18 PM
Whisper Whisper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Getting my cbets min raised
Posts: 1,012
Default Re: $100 Overpair vs passive

Becaseu you guys are deep, make a smallish bet on turn to control theh size of the pot. I really dont think you can get it in here and be ahead that often. If he called turn i would probebly b/f river like 1/2 to 2/3 pot.

As for your RR pf, its wayyy too small. OOP, with deep stacks, make it at least 17 or something. Will also be easier to stack KK/QQ which become a larger part of his calling range.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-18-2007, 04:25 PM
aislephive aislephive is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: And now the children are asleep
Posts: 6,874
Default Re: $100 Overpair vs passive

[ QUOTE ]
AP - do you think that his range is heavily weighted towards QQ/KK?

Personally I think he can have 99+ here as well as a FD, and I don't know that he bets 99,1010, or a FD if tis checked to him (he has a .7 AF). I agree that we can stack-a-donk KK/QQ here, but I think we lose value against the rest of range.

I like leading the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

He doesn't raise often preflop, and he has called a reraise and a flop bet on a rag board. KK/QQ/JJ seems very likely. When he has TT/99, it's also better to check the turn and then value bet the river because it's very unlikely TT/99 will call a turn bet with the threat of a massive river bet lurking. Bottom line is I don't think we should ever be folding here. Bet/call is fine I guess, I prefer turn c/r ai though for the reasons mentioned earlier.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-18-2007, 05:10 PM
Jay Riall Jay Riall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Over the line
Posts: 15,184
Default Re: $100 Overpair vs passive

Anything is good except the way you actually played it [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-18-2007, 05:12 PM
RiverHebrew2 RiverHebrew2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,293
Default Re: $100 Overpair vs passive

Is he weak/tight and passive or is he passive with huge hands, or is he just a fish. If he's a fish, bet $55 on this turn. If he's weak tight, check turn and valuebet riv, as this board is pretty safe unless a diamond peels off on riv.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.