#1
|
|||
|
|||
$100 Overpair vs passive
<font color="green">31/7/.7 over 270hands 26/66 WTSD/W$SD </font>
Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums) BB ($100) UTG ($45.07) MP ($189.80) CO ($239.85) Button ($73.08) Hero ($282.45) Preflop: Hero is SB with A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. Hero posts a blind of $0.50. <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP raises to $4</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero (poster) raises to $12.5</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP calls $9. Flop: ($27) 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $20</font>, MP calls $20. Turn: ($67) J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> Plan? His range? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100 Overpair vs passive
pretty safe board. keep betting into him. his range, small pocket pair, bigger pocket pair and flush draw.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100 Overpair vs passive
edit: wow nm I suck at reading. Based on stats and his possible range, I think aislephive's stackadonk plan is pretty sexy here.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100 Overpair vs passive
I'd stackadonk here. He'll likely bet KK/QQ on turn if checked to him and will call a shove a lot.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100 Overpair vs passive
[ QUOTE ]
I would bet like 45 and fold to a raise. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] I bet every street. Stackadonk is an option, but against the player described, I just keep betting. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100 Overpair vs passive
AP - do you think that his range is heavily weighted towards QQ/KK?
Personally I think he can have 99+ here as well as a FD, and I don't know that he bets 99,1010, or a FD if tis checked to him (he has a .7 AF). I agree that we can stack-a-donk KK/QQ here, but I think we lose value against the rest of range. I like leading the turn. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100 Overpair vs passive
Becaseu you guys are deep, make a smallish bet on turn to control theh size of the pot. I really dont think you can get it in here and be ahead that often. If he called turn i would probebly b/f river like 1/2 to 2/3 pot.
As for your RR pf, its wayyy too small. OOP, with deep stacks, make it at least 17 or something. Will also be easier to stack KK/QQ which become a larger part of his calling range. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100 Overpair vs passive
[ QUOTE ]
AP - do you think that his range is heavily weighted towards QQ/KK? Personally I think he can have 99+ here as well as a FD, and I don't know that he bets 99,1010, or a FD if tis checked to him (he has a .7 AF). I agree that we can stack-a-donk KK/QQ here, but I think we lose value against the rest of range. I like leading the turn. [/ QUOTE ] He doesn't raise often preflop, and he has called a reraise and a flop bet on a rag board. KK/QQ/JJ seems very likely. When he has TT/99, it's also better to check the turn and then value bet the river because it's very unlikely TT/99 will call a turn bet with the threat of a massive river bet lurking. Bottom line is I don't think we should ever be folding here. Bet/call is fine I guess, I prefer turn c/r ai though for the reasons mentioned earlier. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100 Overpair vs passive
Anything is good except the way you actually played it [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100 Overpair vs passive
Is he weak/tight and passive or is he passive with huge hands, or is he just a fish. If he's a fish, bet $55 on this turn. If he's weak tight, check turn and valuebet riv, as this board is pretty safe unless a diamond peels off on riv.
|
|
|