Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Beginners Questions
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-08-2007, 03:04 PM
Tomatoes Tomatoes is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 37
Default RNGs and results based thinking

Just read an interesting article and thought I'd share it... something to think about next time you fold a hand (in an on-line game) before all the community cards have been dealt only to find that you would have had the best hand if you had stayed in. The truth is that if you had stayed in, the cards that were dealt would probably have been different cards than the ones that were actually dealt after you folded.

I'll quote part of the article below; the complete article can be found at http://www.overcards.com/wiki/moin.cgi/FreeYourMind.

"One of the most maddening things about community card games like Texas Hold'em is that we can see what we would have had if we stayed in. Or at least, that's true in real life. In online poker, that's not true.

Many people reading this will be shocked. . . after all, in real-world poker, once the cards are shuffled, the order is not going to change. Whether you fold or stay, the next cards will be the next cards. But online, that is not true. They are not shuffled at all. Instead, every time a cards is necessary, one is chosen at random from the available cards. Let me say that again: the next card is not even decided until it's necessary.

This is done to ensure that the cards are random and unpredictable to players. You see, which card will be randomly picked is a function of many timing delays, including the time it takes players to make their decisions. So if you fold, you are no longer a timing factor. The cards that come later are not the same ones that would have come if you had stayed in, and continued to affect the play of the hand. For more technical details on how it works, see RandomNumberGenerator.

The upshot is that once you fold, you will never know what "would have" happened if you stayed in. The converse is true, too. . . when you stay in, it's not a given that a particular [card] will come or not. You can't conclude that you should not have called with your four-flush just because it didnt' come in; if you folded, it might have! Every player involved is affecting the timing and therefore the outcome. You can't say what would have happened if you acted differently, because your different action would change what happened. . ."
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-08-2007, 03:16 PM
Talon0110 Talon0110 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 68
Default Re: RNGs and results based thinking

I never thought of it that way before...very interesting information....nice post.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.