![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm curious.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I dont think it bothers. It's modus operandi seems to be finding things evolution cant (so far) explain and saying Aha! Any actual accounting for biological facts seems a subsidiary goal.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Did you mean intelligent design or creationists? I thought some forms of ID were compatible with evolution.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I thought some forms of ID were compatible with evolution. [/ QUOTE ] No. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I thought some forms of ID were compatible with evolution. [/ QUOTE ] No. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, I was thinking of something else (Christians who believe that evolution was God's mechanism for creating life? don't know what this is called). My mistake. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ID doesn't explain anything. Explanation is not the role it evolved to serve.
chez |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
ID doesn't explain anything. Explanation is not the role it evolved to serve. chez [/ QUOTE ] Typical of all branches of dogmatic thought. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm sure their reasoning goes like this:
You can't prove vestigial organs are completely useless. /me playing devil's advocate. (or is it God's advocate?) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I thought some forms of ID were compatible with evolution. [/ QUOTE ] No. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, I was thinking of something else (Christians who believe that evolution was God's mechanism for creating life? don't know what this is called). My mistake. [/ QUOTE ] I don't know if there is a name for it, but if you want me to take a shot at coining one, I'd go with 'reluctant acquiescence.' Of course, its entirely legitimate that evolution IS the mechanism that God used to accomplish his goals (forgiving my use of anthropomorphic terms) just like its entirely legitimate that evolution is the invisible, immaterial (cloaking devices, obv) aliens way of running some massive experiment. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I thought some forms of ID were compatible with evolution. [/ QUOTE ] No. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, I was thinking of something else (Christians who believe that evolution was God's mechanism for creating life? don't know what this is called). My mistake. [/ QUOTE ] I don't know if there is a name for it, but if you want me to take a shot at coining one, I'd go with 'reluctant acquiescence.' Of course, its entirely legitimate that evolution IS the mechanism that God used to accomplish his goals (forgiving my use of anthropomorphic terms) just like its entirely legitimate that evolution is the invisible, immaterial (cloaking devices, obv) aliens way of running some massive experiment. [/ QUOTE ] Actually, there's even a range of "god uses evolution" ideas. The most common is called "guided evolution" (evolution happens, but it could never happen randomly, so god helps out with the details). |
![]() |
|
|