Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-30-2007, 07:21 AM
Allday Everyday Allday Everyday is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In the donkey show.
Posts: 1,000
Default 5/10. QTs. Should we bet this river? If not, why not? If so, why so?

5/10 full ring online LHE. No read on villain, other than me not noticing him doing anything out of the ordinary/standard. I am most interested in the river action. I am interested in HU value betting with 4 to a flush on the board and no flush in our hands.

Preflop: Hero is dealt Q [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], T [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] in the H/J.
Folds, Hero raises, 3 folds, BB calls.

Flop: K [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 6 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], T [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
BB checks, Hero bets, BB calls.

Turn: 2 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
BB checks, Hero bets, BB calls.

River: T [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
BB checks, Hero...

Also, what if the BB had Q [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], T [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]? Should he have donk-bet the river?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-30-2007, 07:31 AM
BigBadBabar BigBadBabar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: working on my 5k post yo
Posts: 5,000
Default Re: 5/10. QTs. Should we bet this river? If not, why not? If so, why so?

i would check behind, because if we bet/fold, i am somewhat uncertain as to what villain would be calling with that we beat, frankly. first to act i can see the clarkmeister but last to act i am happy to check behind. i guess if we bet it he might call with a king or some kind of pocket pair but i think that it is unlikely. it's also somewhat possible that he has the flush and may wait to checkraise us.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-30-2007, 07:55 AM
HoneyBadger HoneyBadger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,585
Default Re: 5/10. QTs. Should we bet this river? If not, why not? If so, why s

Hmmm tricky. I'd probably check behind... although there are still a lot of hands that we beat and that might call. I just don't want to b/f with trips. Or having a bluff induced when he holds a low heart. OOP I'd probably bet.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-30-2007, 09:07 AM
WalkAmongUs WalkAmongUs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UB and FTP
Posts: 1,049
Default Re: 5/10. QTs. Should we bet this river? If not, why not? If so, why s

i'd check behind too. i wouldn't be able to fold to a raise w/ no read if i bet.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-30-2007, 09:26 AM
threads13 threads13 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: thread13.com
Posts: 2,681
Default Re: 5/10. QTs. Should we bet this river? If not, why not? If so, why s

I check behind on this river. I just don't think your villain has many calling hands that we are ahead of.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-30-2007, 09:43 AM
James. James. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: McFadden for Heisman
Posts: 5,963
Default Re: 5/10. QTs. Should we bet this river? If not, why not? If so, why so?

bet. he'll still call with any pair and i really don't see you getting bluffed very often on a paired board with a 4flush on it. i bet two pair in that spot, so i'll bet trips as well.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-30-2007, 09:46 AM
Allday Everyday Allday Everyday is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In the donkey show.
Posts: 1,000
Default Re: 5/10. QTs. Should we bet this river? If not, why not? If so, why so?

At the river I think we have a very good hand. Given the HU steal situation, I think there are definately worse hands than ours that will call the river for one bet.

Mathematically, villain probably doesn't have a [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. I know this finding is distorted by the fact that he called both flop and turn, however, he checked when the flush draw hit. He should know we probably don't have a [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. An induced bluff from villain seems unlikely as we have bet the whole way (appear to him to have something), and now have the option of a free SD.

[ QUOTE ]
i wouldn't be able to fold to a raise w/ no read if i bet.

[/ QUOTE ]
How often would a non-maniacal, non-tilting opponent check-raise this river with a worse hand than ours? I don't think it would be enough for us to call here.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-30-2007, 10:57 AM
RED_RAIN RED_RAIN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Plymouth, MN
Posts: 3,047
Default Re: 5/10. QTs. Should we bet this river? If not, why not? If so, why s

I would not call a c/r on the river.

If you bet, I think even if he c/c with a better hand, you may build up some future bets because they won't know if you have a flush or not. Plus, not a horrible value bet anyways for amount of Kings he will call without a heart.

I'd likely bet with no reads.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-30-2007, 11:22 AM
tewall tewall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: midwest
Posts: 2,211
Default Re: 5/10. QTs. Should we bet this river? If not, why not? If so, why s

[ QUOTE ]
I just don't want to b/f with trips. Or having a bluff induced when he holds a low heart.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a separate problem. If betting is profitable, it's profitable. It doesn't matter if he might raise. Whether to call a raise becomes another problem to solve. If you are convinced betting is profitable, you should bet.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-30-2007, 12:28 PM
HoneyBadger HoneyBadger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,585
Default Re: 5/10. QTs. Should we bet this river? If not, why not? If so, why s

But then you must include the possibility of being raised in your betting profatibility assumption. That is why they pick 55% of calling hands you beat and not 50%.

I don't think you should be blind to future action. It is probably ok to give up a small edge to avoid potentially making a big mistake later. Unless you already include that mistake, and betting is still profitable. Then it doesn't matter.

Anyway, I'm convinced. A bet is probably better. I was just thinking which hands he would check. Certainly not a heart, right?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.