#1
|
|||
|
|||
profit/rake ratio of sng\'s compared to cashgames
i have a roi of 7% on the 215$ sng's on a large samplesize
roughly the 15$ rake is also 7% so my profit/rake ratio is roughly 1/1 i am lately experimenting with cashgames limit/ no-limit but not a meaningfull database of hands to make some significant conclusions ive a few questions -whats the comparing no limit cashgame blind level compared to a 215$ sng -whats the typical amount of BB/100 for a "typical winner" in that level -and how much rake is paid in relation to that amount of BB/100 wich can be translated to a ratio and how are the same questions related to a comparible limit cashgame? regards pieter |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: profit/rake ratio of sng\'s compared to cashgames
Not sure if this is what you're looking for but here goes:
I've played 18,500 hands of 6 max ($1)NL. I've made $1,846 which is 5.01 PTBB/100 hands. They've raked $1,194.75. profit/rake = 1846/1194 = 1.54 ~ 3/2 ratio If you figure in the rakeback 25% * 1194 = 298 profit/rake = 2144/1194 = 1.79 ~ 9/5 ratio I'm sure people have a higher BB/100 win rate. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: profit/rake ratio of sng\'s compared to cashgames
$215 - recommended bankroll = about $20k
$5/10 NL - recommended bankroll = at least $20k (preferably more, but 20 buy-ins wouldn't be excessively low) Try $3/$6 for a while to get into it. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: profit/rake ratio of sng\'s compared to cashgames
anymore people with some data on their profit/rake ratio?
|
|
|