What is your PTBB/100 at 25 and 50NL

[StavrosT]

?

[TKWest]

5.95 PTBB/100

[Sir Winalot]

37.23

[ama0330]

ONE BILLION DOLLARS

[TKWest]

Got this from another post:

Here's the official 2+2 breakdown for GWA (General Winrate Assumptions):


Negative PTBB : Thank god for Bonus whoring. Now get back to the Zoo.

0 - 1.4 PTBB : Remember that aces can make straights on both high and low ends !

1.5 - 2.4 PTBB : No, 5678 does not beat ace high.

2.5 - 4 PTBB : I bet you're typing "nh.." pretty damn often.

4.1 - 6 PTBB : No, a LAG isn't a problem in your internet connection.

6.1 - 8 PTBB : Hmmm... yeah .. not bad .. not bad .. come back in 50k hands and we'll see ..

8.1 - 10 PTBB : You have OBVIOUSLY being bad beating a lot of people. It's because of people like you that some of us sane winning players are throwing rigged theories around ! Stay away from my table you lucky fish !!!

10.1 + PTBB : Okay junior, enough with the [censored]. With that sample size, we can't even tell if you're a winning player AT ALL. You need at least 500 posts to be considered a serious poker player. You might not even be worthy of existing yet ! Spread your non-sense lies elsewhere ! I'm notifying the moderator !

[barryc83]

"4.1 - 6 PTBB : No, a LAG isn't a problem in your internet connection."

QFT. This is so true. Those laggy bastards give me so many problems.

[KurtSF]

4

[img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[grouchie]

[ QUOTE ]
?

[/ QUOTE ]

why aren't you posting yours?

[Antinome]

I'll get back to you in 100K hands when I finish regressing to the mean. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[SmallPotJeff]

152.8 PTBB/100 [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]


...


Sample size of 25 [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/Jackass]

about 8.6PTBB/100 over the last 15,000 hands