#1
|
|||
|
|||
River decision
Opponent here is 46/18/1.10 over 100ish hands.
Full Tilt Poker Limit Holdem Ring game Limit: $5/$10 6 players Converter Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is UTG+1 with T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] UTG folds, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#cc0000">CO 3-bets</font>, 3 folds, Hero calls. Flop: 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (7.5SB, 2 players) Hero checks, <font color="#cc0000">CO bets</font>, Hero calls. Turn: Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (4.75BB, 2 players) Hero checks, <font color="#cc0000">CO bets</font>, Hero calls. River: 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (6.75BB, 2 players) I feel like check-calling allows him to check through all his worse hands and bet his better ones. However, neither donk/calling or donk/folding seem appealing. Thoughts? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: River decision
I mix up my turn/river lines here so often.
This guy seems passive enough that I would consider a turn bet/fold. I don't know how much that sucks though. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: River decision
With your opponents passiveness post-flop a turn bet/fold is the play. With this line you take control of the hand and are able to find out exactly where he is at.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: River decision
b/f the turn is just no good. AF does not converge over 100 hands. He's 40/20. No b/f'ing. c/c the river.
|
|
|