My first 10k hands *WARNING* stats

[EvanJC]

here they are. my won@sd is under 50 so i have a hunch i'm running pretty bad. But all in all, it appears i'm not a winning player at this point, even at the lowest levels. can anything be gleaned from these stats? thanks [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]





holla!

[Troll_Inc]

[ QUOTE ]

can anything be gleaned from these stats? thanks

[/ QUOTE ]

You're not a winning player?

Your positional stats seem ok, probably get a little tighter.

Go into your database and look through your ten biggest losing hands and analyze pot odds on each street compared to what your opponent held.

If you have any specific hand Q's post them here.

[beset]

[ QUOTE ]

You're not a winning player?


[/ QUOTE ]

I wouldn't go that far, Troll. I have lost over much longer stretches and am still a solid winner but maybe 10k losing is unheard of at 25PLO never really played it.

[jhall23]

Don't read to much in the W$SD number around 50% is pretty normal I think. Your numbers are right around mine from the beggining of my omaha playing days for the 25-100 games over a larger sample with a 7PTBB/100 win rate. Mine is 49.19.

Other then that I can't really make any assumptions based on the stats. You could easily have those stats and it wouldn't suprise me if you had a decent win rate.

I'd just look at decent sized pots on both wins and loses and see how they look and keep posting hands.

[iggymcfly]

I lost my old database and have recently been doing most of play on Bodog though, so I really don't have a lot of hands to compare to.

However, I do get the impression that you're passively going to showdown when you should be taking pots down on the flop and turn. Try ratcheting up the aggression a little bit.

[Troll_Inc]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

You're not a winning player?


[/ QUOTE ]

I wouldn't go that far, Troll. I have lost over much longer stretches and am still a solid winner but maybe 10k losing is unheard of at 25PLO never really played it.

[/ QUOTE ]

True, I should have said that his stats tells us _over that set of hands_ he is not a winning player.

As my stats professor was fond of saying, "Only god knows the true mean". This particularly applies to poker. I wonder if God plays poker, what his favorite game is.

[EvanJC]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

You're not a winning player?


[/ QUOTE ]

I wouldn't go that far, Troll. I have lost over much longer stretches and am still a solid winner but maybe 10k losing is unheard of at 25PLO never really played it.

[/ QUOTE ]

jesus christ, you guys are surly ^_^ this post is pretty lame, but i was just looking to identify any glaring leaks. thanks for the replies.

[EvanJC]

oh, i understand lol. i thought you were calling me a troll.

here's the positional stats again, they don't seem to be working in the op.

[DrMagic]

Tighten up in the SB, but in general 10k hands is nowhere near enough.

[kojak77]

This is my first post so be gentle [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Here are my stats, when I was learning omaha in spring 2006. 9k hands nutpeddling PLO25 full and I think I did ok for a beginner. At those microlevels nutpeddling is not a bad way to make a little bit of money...