Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-15-2007, 01:08 PM
Riku Riku is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Master of Law
Posts: 856
Default KJ against a pf raiser

Villain was quite new to the table but seemed tightish.

Poker Stars
Limit Holdem Ring game
Limit: $0.05/$0.1
10 players
Converter

Pre-flop: (10 players) Hero is BB with J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
UTG calls, 5 folds, CO calls, Button calls, <font color="#cc0000">SB raises</font>, Hero calls, UTG calls, CO calls, Button calls.

Flop: K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (10SB, 5 players)
<font color="#cc0000">SB bets</font>, Hero raises ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-15-2007, 01:38 PM
Befolder Befolder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Heading back to black
Posts: 2,311
Default Re: KJ against a pf raiser

Well what range do we put him on?

It could be a lot of things.

99-AA, AK-AJs, AK-AK, KQs-JTs, Axs (if he's one of those types to build a bit pot.

So we're ahead of a lot, but I've put a pretty wide range out there. Wider than I raise with in this situation.

I'd be inclined to raise to knock out the field even if we're behind.

Board is nice and dry but I doubt it's correct to just call down since we want to maximize our chances of winning now.

If it were heads up, I'd just call every bet he'd put in, thus maximizing our gain if ahead and not letting him fold earlier if he's behind.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-15-2007, 02:43 PM
nerdking nerdking is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: fishmax ironman
Posts: 1,145
Default Re: KJ against a pf raiser

hero raises and reevaluates on the turn. A raise forces the remaining field to put either 2 in cold or to repop, thus giving you even more info.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-15-2007, 02:54 PM
Big Folder Big Folder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hastings 3L!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posts: 620
Default Re: KJ against a pf raiser

if he is tightish and understands position you could be dominated with an offsuit hand which sucks.

On the flop you have to raise. You have to protect in this situation and you'll face the field with 12:2 odds which should drop out/make calling unprofitable for tons of draws. You have to raise and if he three-bets then you get worried.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-15-2007, 08:42 PM
Point Blank Point Blank is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,843
Default Re: KJ against a pf raiser

I think if you have an issue with raising the flop here, then I don't think you should be calling SB's raise with this hand.

you have top pair on a really dry board (what more did you want when you called) ... or, are you thinking that raising here isn't really 'protecting' your hand, given the size of the pot? ...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-15-2007, 09:01 PM
00Snitch 00Snitch is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,260
Default Re: KJ against a pf raiser

i think befolder got it. this is a raise. pot is big, so you want to do what you can to win it.

however, i think the range you have given may be a bit too broad for an unknown raising from the SB. 99? hrmmm, maybe. Axs? JTs? AJ? i think more people would complete those hands than raise them.

i would probably narrow it a little to something like AA-TT (TT might even be out), AK-AQ. possibly KQ. now, im pretty sure most of those hands (maybe not AQ) would cbet this flop.

ok, so im being a nit, but it makes sense yes?

given that range (most of which you are ahead of, might need a litte adjusting for AQ and TT not always being in the range) and that the pot is big and that you want to protect your hand, i raise.

i think we call a 3-bet and fold the turn UI.

if our raise is just called, i guess we bet if checked to on the turn and fold to a c/r?

if we bet the turn and are called, i think the river will also be a b/f.

so our possible lines will be:

raise-call -&gt; fold UI
raise -&gt; b/f -&gt; b/f

if our flop raise doesnt get it HU, it could be interesting. i would be a bit concerned about someone cold-calling two on this flop after we raise.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-15-2007, 09:11 PM
00Snitch 00Snitch is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,260
Default Re: KJ against a pf raiser

[ QUOTE ]
are you thinking that raising here isn't really 'protecting' your hand, given the size of the pot?

[/ QUOTE ]

i think a raise protects against many potential holdings. A5-A2 spring to mind.

however, if this pot was small, i think calling (to build the pot) is an option.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-15-2007, 09:24 PM
unterfish unterfish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Trolling Micros
Posts: 811
Default Re: KJ against a pf raiser

[ QUOTE ]
however, if this pot was small, i think calling (to build the pot) is an option.


[/ QUOTE ]
Im not sure. I think our hand is vulnerable. I dont know if building a pot here is heros goal.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-15-2007, 09:46 PM
00Snitch 00Snitch is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,260
Default Re: KJ against a pf raiser

[ QUOTE ]

I dont know if building a pot here is heros goal


[/ QUOTE ]

there isnt really much point in talking about "building a pot" with the given hand (because the pot is already built [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]). so i shouldn't have really brought it up...

but what im trying to get at is: if the pot was smaller, say not raised pf, i think it would be better to call because hands like i mentioned (A5-A2, or anthing down to around 5-6 outs) are getting incorrect odds to call, so we want them to. i.e. our hand is not vulnerable to those hands if the pot was small, because they are drawing incorrectly (should they choose to call).

in the given hand (big pot), or hand is vulnerable to hands with 5 or 6 outs because they are getting correct odds to call one bet. therefore we raise and make it unprofitable for them to call.

i hope im getting this right... [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-15-2007, 10:37 PM
unterfish unterfish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Trolling Micros
Posts: 811
Default Re: KJ against a pf raiser

I agree. This is getting very hypothetical.
If the pot was small, I guess I would still raise in hope to isolate SB and buy a better position.
(But Im not so sure if my line is right.)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.